咨询与建议

看过本文的还看了

相关文献

该作者的其他文献

文献详情 >Performance comparison between... 收藏

Performance comparison between waverider and wide-speed-range gliding vehicle based on CFD approaches

Performance comparison between waverider and wide-speed-range gliding vehicle based on CFD approaches

作     者:ZHANG TianTian WANG ZhenGuo HUANG Wei YAN XiaoTing 

作者机构:Science and Technology on Scramjet Laboratory National University of Defense Technology 

出 版 物:《Science China(Technological Sciences)》 (中国科学(技术科学英文版))

年 卷 期:2019年第62卷第10期

页      面:1861-1870页

核心收录:

学科分类:08[工学] 0825[工学-航空宇航科学与技术] 

基  金:supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(Grant No.11502291) 

主  题:wide-speed range cone-derived waverider volumetric efficiency lift-to-drag ratio loading property 

摘      要:Wide-speed-range gliding vehicle(WSRGV) is designed to adapt to the variable cruising environment that hypersonic vehicles will encounter during the mission implementation. Based on the cone-derived theory, a novel design technique of WSRGV has been developed. Theoretically, the functional relationship between cone-derived waverider’s volumetric efficiency and its design Mach number can be built through sampling approach as long as the geometries of design conical shock wave and the upper base curve are fixed. Based on the functional relationship, a cone-derived waverider that owns the same volumetric efficiency with a giving WSRGV can be acquired. This paper compared the aerodynamic performance between WSRGV and the cone-derived waverider sharing the same volumetric efficiency in a wide Mach number range. Their aerodynamic properties versus angle of attack have also been compared under the waverider’s design Mach number. The obtained result shows that WSRGV shares similar aerodynamic performance with the cone-derived waverider with the same volumetric efficiency. The aero-surfaces in the margin area of this kind of configuration have a larger contribution to the lift-to-drag ratio in comparison with the aero-surfaces in the central area. The configuration with a thick central body and thin margin place owns not only better aerodynamic performance but also better loading property.

读者评论 与其他读者分享你的观点

用户名:未登录
我的评分