Comparison between Fermi detected and non-Fermi detected superluminal sources

作     者：HuBing Xiao JunHui Fan JiangHe Yang Yi Liu YuHai Yuan Jun Tao Denise Costantin YuTao Zhang ZhiYuan Pei LiXia Zhang WenXin Yang 

作者机构：Center for AstrophysicsGuangzhou UniversityGuangzhou 510006China Department of Physics and AstronomyUniversity of PadovaPadova PD 35131Italy Astronomy Science and Technology Research Laboratory of Department of Education of Guangdong ProvinceGuangzhou 510006China Department of Physics and Electronics ScienceHunan University of Arts and ScienceChangde 415000China Shanghai Astronomical ObservatoryChinese Academy of SciencesShanghai 210006China 

出 版 物：《Science China(Physics,Mechanics & Astronomy)》 (中国科学：物理学、力学、天文学（英文版）)

年 卷 期：2019年第62卷第12期

页      面：110-125页

核心收录：

学科分类：07[理学] 070401[理学-天体物理] 0704[理学-天文学] 

基　　金：supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(Grant Nos.11733001,U1531245,10633010,11173009,and11403006) the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province(Grant No.2017A030313011) the Astrophysics Key Subjects of Guangdong Province and Guangzhou City the Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou(Grant No.201707010401) 

主　　题：active galactic nuclei jets γ-rays correlations 

摘      要：Active galactic nuclei（AGNs） have been attracting research attention due to their special observable properties. Specifically,a majority of AGNs are detected by Fermi-LAT missions, but not by Fermi-LAT, which raises the question of weather any differences exist between the two. To answer this issue, we compile a sample of 291 superluminal AGNs（189 FDSs and 102 nonFDSs） from available multi-wavelength radio, optical, and X-ray（or even γ-ray） data and Doppler factors and proper motion（μ）(or apparent velocity(βapp)); calculated the apparent velocity from their proper motion, Lorentz factor（Γ）, viewing angle（?） and co-moving viewing angle(?co) for the sources with available Doppler factor（δ）; and performed some statistical analyses for both types. Our study indicated that（1） in terms of average values, FDSs have higher proper motions（μ）, apparent velocities(βapp),Doppler factor（δ）, Lorentz factor（Γ）, and smaller viewing angle（?）. Nevertheless, there is no clear difference in co-moving viewing angles（?∞）. The results reveal that FDSs show stronger beaming effect than non-FDSs.（2） In terms of correlations:1) both sources show positive, mutually correlated fluxes, which become closer in de-beamed fluxes; 2) with respect to apparent velocities and γ-ray luminosity, there is a tendency for the brighter sources to have higher velocities; 3) with regard to viewing angle and observed γ-ray luminosity, log? =-（0.23 ± 0.04）log Lγ+（11.14 ± 1.93）, while for the co-moving viewing angle and the intrinsic γ-ray luminosity, log?∞=（0.09 ± 0.01）log Lγn-（1.73 ± 0.48）. These correlations show that the luminous γ-ray sources have smaller viewing angles and a larger co-moving viewing angle, which indicate a stronger beaming effect in γ-ray emissions.