咨询与建议

看过本文的还看了

相关文献

该作者的其他文献

文献详情 >Optical biometry intraocular l... 收藏

Optical biometry intraocular lens power calculation using different formulas in patients with different axial lengths

Optical biometry intraocular lens power calculation using different formulas in patients with different axial lengths

作     者:Jia-Kang Wang Shu-Wen Chang 

作者机构:Department of Ophthalmology Far Eastern Memorial Hospital Oriental Institute of Technology Department of Medicine National Yang Ming University 

出 版 物:《International Journal of Ophthalmology(English edition)》 (国际眼科杂志(英文版))

年 卷 期:2013年第6卷第2期

页      面:150-154页

核心收录:

学科分类:1002[医学-临床医学] 100212[医学-眼科学] 10[医学] 

基  金:supported by grants of Far Eastern Memorial Hospital (FEMH-97-HHC-008)  Taiwan China 

主  题:intraocular lens optical biometry calculation formula 

摘      要:AIM: To investigate the predictability of intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation using the IOLMaster and different IOL power calculation formulas in eyes with various axial length (AL). METHODS: Patients were included who underwent uneventful phacoemulsification with IOL implantation in the Department of Ophthalmology, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, China from February 2007 to January 2009. Preoperative AL and keratometric values (Ks) were measured by IOLMaster optical biometry. Patients were divided into 3 groups based on AL less than 22mm (Group 1), 22-26mm (Group 2), and more than 26mm (Group 3). The power of the implanted IOL was used to calculate the predicted postoperative spherical equivalence (SE) by various formulas: the Haigis, Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, and SRK/T. The predictive accuracy of each formula was analyzed by comparing the difference between the actual and predicted postoperative SE (MedAE, median absolute error). All the patients had follow-up periods exceeding 3 months. RESULTS: Totally, there were 200 eyes (33 eyes in Group 1, 92 eyes in Group 2, 75 eyes in Group 3). In all patients, the Haigis had the significantly lower MedAE generated by the other formulas (P0.05). In Group 1 to 3, the MedAE calculated by the Haigis was either significantly lower or comparable to those calculated by the other ***: Compared with other formulas using IOLMaster biometric data, the Haigis formula yields superior refractive results in eyes with various AL.

读者评论 与其他读者分享你的观点

用户名:未登录
我的评分