咨询与建议

看过本文的还看了

相关文献

该作者的其他文献

文献详情 >Sensitivity of digital elevati... 收藏

Sensitivity of digital elevation models:The scenario from two tropical mountain river basins of the Western Ghats,India

Sensitivity of digital elevation models:The scenario from two tropical mountain river basins of the Western Ghats,India

作     者:Jobin Thomas Sabu Joseph K.P.Thrivikramji K.S.Arunkumar 

作者机构:Inter University Centre for Geospatial Information Science and TechnologyUniversity of KeralaThiruvananthapuramKeralaIndia Department of Environmental SciencesUniversity of KeralaThiruvananthapuramKeralaIndia Department of GeologyUniversity of KeralaThiruvananthapuramKeralaIndia Department of GeologyMES CollegePonnaniMalappuramKeralaIndia 

出 版 物:《Geoscience Frontiers》 (地学前缘(英文版))

年 卷 期:2014年第5卷第6期

页      面:893-909页

核心收录:

学科分类:08[工学] 081601[工学-大地测量学与测量工程] 0816[工学-测绘科学与技术] 

基  金:Financial support from Kerala State Council for Science Technology and Environment Thiruvananthapuram and permission for the field studies in the protected areas by Kerala Forest Department 

主  题:DEM ASTER SRTM GMTEDTropical mountain river basins Western Ghats 

摘      要:The paper evaluates sensitivity of various spaceborne digital elevation models (DEMs), viz., Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer (ASTER), Shuttle Radar Topography Mapping Mission (SRTM) and Global Multi-resolution Terrain Elevation Data 2010 (GMTED), in comparison with the DEM (TOPO) derived from contour data of 20 m interval of Survey of India topographic sheets of 1 : 50,000 scale. Several topographic attributes, such as elevation (above mean sea level), relative relief, slope, aspect, curvature, slope-length and -steepness (LS) factor, terrain ruggedness index (TRI), topo- graphic wetness index (TWI), hypsometric integral (lhyp) and drainage network attributes (stream number and stream length) of two tropical mountain river basins, viz. Muthirapuzha River Basin and Pambar River Basin are compared to evaluate the variations. Though the basins are comparable in extent, they differ in respect of terrain characteristics and climate. The result.,; suggest that ASTER and SRTM provide equally reliable representation of topography portrayed by TOP() and the topographic attributes extracted from the spaceborne DEMs are in agreement with those derived from TOPO. Despite the coarser resolution, SRTM shows relatively higher vertical accuracy (RMSE -- 23 and 20 m respectively in MRB and PRB) compared to ASTER (RMSE - 33 and 24 m) and GMTED (RMSE - 59 and 48 m). Vertical accuracy of all the spaceborne DEMs is influenced by relief of the terrain as well as type of vegetation. Further, GMTED shows significant deviation for most of the attributes, indicating its inability for mountain-river-basin-scale studies.

读者评论 与其他读者分享你的观点

用户名:未登录
我的评分