咨询与建议

看过本文的还看了

相关文献

该作者的其他文献

文献详情 >以“史”为学与以“历史”为学 收藏

以“史”为学与以“历史”为学

“Narrative”As Discipline vs.“Historical Narrative”As Discipline

作     者:李纪祥 于沛 

作者机构:台北中国文化大学历史系教授 不详 

出 版 物:《史学理论研究》 (Historiography Bimonthly)

年 卷 期:2001年第2期

页      面:11-19页

核心收录:

学科分类:060301[历史学-世界史学理论与史学史] 060203[历史学-史学理论及中国史学史] 06[历史学] 0602[历史学-中国史] 0603[历史学-世界史] 

主  题:近代史 历史学家 为学 事件 西方 构成 产生 

摘      要:In current new style schools,there are departments of “historical narrative(li shi,历史)and ones of “narrative(shi史).Yet,different names make no difference to curriculum,which truly deserves a true reflection upon the existence of the concept of “narrative as embedded in the new stryle curriculum *** paper attempts to go through modern consciousness of this,looking to it that,“modern historyis originally a result of spheric unbalance,East and West,Ancient and ***,it is a “narrativeof other *** upon the origin witness difference in contemporality;and,reflection upon the subject in the past proves“historiesin ***,be it in the discipline of “narrativeor in that of “historical narrative,as caged is always the subject as reflected in “histroies.

读者评论 与其他读者分享你的观点

用户名:未登录
我的评分