咨询与建议

看过本文的还看了

相关文献

该作者的其他文献

文献详情 >Manual mid-stromal dissection ... 收藏

Manual mid-stromal dissection as a low risk procedure to stabilize mild to moderate progressive keratoconus

作     者:Rénuka S Birbal Korine van Dijk Jack S Parker Henny Otten Maha Belmoukadim Lisanne Ham Lamis Baydoun Isabel Dapena Gerrit R J Melles 

作者机构:Netherlands Institute for Innovative Ocular Surgery(NIIOS)RotterdamLaan op Zuid 883071AA RotterdamThe Netherlands Melles Cornea Clinic RotterdamRotterdamThe Netherlands Amnitrans EyeBank RotterdamRotterdamThe Netherlands. NIIOS-USASan DiegoUSA Parker CorneaBirminghamALUSA Visser Contact Lens Practice Nijmegen/RotterdamRotterdamThe Netherlands 

出 版 物:《Eye and Vision》 (眼视光学杂志(英文))

年 卷 期:2018年第5卷第1期

页      面:233-239页

核心收录:

学科分类:1002[医学-临床医学] 100214[医学-肿瘤学] 10[医学] 

主  题:Keratoconus Manual cornea dissection Progressive ectasia Surgical technique 

摘      要:Background:To evaluate the efficacy of manual mid-stromal dissection in stabilizing progressive ***:Surgeries were performed in 16 eyes of 14 patients with progressive *** eyes were examined before and at 1 day,1 week,1,3,6 and 12 months after surgery,and every 6 months ***(simK,Kmax and pachymetry),best corrected visual acuity(BCVA)and subjective refraction were recorded up to the latest follow-up visit(mean follow-up time 6.6±2.4 years).Results:All surgeries were uneventful,and no postoperative complications *** values(n=15)stabilized in 6/11 eyes(55%)with a preoperative Kmax60 D showed continued *** 11/15 eyes(73%)pachymetry was *** with spectacles remained stable in 7/12 eyes(58%)and improved≥2 Snellen lines in 5/12 eyes(42%).BCVA with a contact lens remained stable in 4/9 eyes(44%),improved≥2 Snellen lines in 3/9 eyes(33%)and deteriorated in 2/9 eyes(22%).Conclusions:Manual mid-stromal dissection was effective in 50%of keratoconic corneas with Kmax values60 D and may be considered in cases ineligible for other interventions such as UV-crosslinking,stromal ring implantation or Bowman layer *** advantage of the procedure may be that the tissue is unaltered and that no synthetic or biological implant is required.

读者评论 与其他读者分享你的观点

用户名:未登录
我的评分