Diagnostic Value of Soluble Suppression of Tumorigenicity-2 for Heart Failure
Diagnostic Value of Soluble Suppression of Tumorigenicity-2 for Heart Failure作者机构:Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Evidence-based Medicine Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases The First Hospital of China Medical University Shenyang Liaoning 110001 China
出 版 物:《Chinese Medical Journal》 (中华医学杂志(英文版))
年 卷 期:2016年第129卷第5期
页 面:570-577页
核心收录:
学科分类:1006[医学-中西医结合] 1002[医学-临床医学] 100602[医学-中西医结合临床] 10[医学]
主 题:Biomarker Diagnosis Heart Failure Meta-analysis Soluble Suppression of Tumorigenicity-2
摘 要:Background:Many studies have explored the diagnostic performance of soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2 (sST2) for heart failure (HF),but the results are ***,we performed a meta-analysis to assess the role of sST2 in the diagnosis of ***:We searched PubMed,Web of Science,Cochrane Library,China National Knowledge Infrastructure,and Wanfang Database from inception to April *** that investigated the diagnostic role of sST2 for HF were *** numbers of true-positive,false-positive,false-negative,and true-negative results were extracted to calculate pooled diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) and the summary receiver operating characteristic curve and area under the curve (AUC).The Spearman correlation coefficient was used to check the threshold *** Cochran Q statistic (P 〈 0.05) and the inconsistency index (I2 〉 50%) were used to assess the nonthreshold ***-regression was conducted to explore the source of heterogeneity;subgroup analysis showed the results in different ***,the Deeks' test was performed to assess the publication ***:Nine articles including 10 studies were included in the *** pooled sensitivity was 0.84 (95% CI:0.81-0.86),and pooled specificity was 0.74 (95% CI:0.72-0.76).The summary DOR was 8.49 (95% CI:4.54-15.86),and AUC was 0.81 (standard error:0.03).The Spearman correlation coefficient identified the nonsignificant threshold effect (coefficient =0.49,P =0.148),but the nonthreshold effect heterogeneity was significant (Cochran Q =58.52,P 〈 0.0001;I2 =84.6%).Meta-regression found that characteristics of controls might be the suggestive source ofnonthreshold effect heterogeneity (P =0.095).Subgroup analysis found that DOR was 5.65 and 7.86,respectively for the controls of hospital patients and healthy ***' test demonstrated that there was no publication bias (P =0.616).Conclusion:The meta-analysis illustrated that sST2 migh