咨询与建议

看过本文的还看了

相关文献

该作者的其他文献

文献详情 >QT Dispersion and QTc Interval... 收藏

QT Dispersion and QTc Interval in Patients with Adult Sickle Cell Disease: Electrocardiographic (EKG) and Echocardiographic Evaluation

QT Dispersion and QTc Interval in Patients with Adult Sickle Cell Disease: Electrocardiographic (EKG) and Echocardiographic Evaluation

作     者:Taysir S. Garadah Adla B. Hassan Mohamed Al Alwai Ahmed A. Jaradat Fathia Qurishi Abdulla Alajmi 

作者机构:Colleges of Medicine and Medical Sciences Arabian Gulf University Manama Kingdom of Bahrain Salmaniya Medical Complex Ministry of Health Manama Kingdom of Bahrain Salmaniya Medical Complex Ministry of Health Manama Kingdom of Bahrain Colleges of Medicine and Medical Sciences Arabian Gulf University Manama Kingdom of Bahrain 

出 版 物:《International Journal of Clinical Medicine》 (临床医学国际期刊(英文))

年 卷 期:2014年第5卷第10期

页      面:550-557页

学科分类:1002[医学-临床医学] 100201[医学-内科学(含:心血管病、血液病、呼吸系病、消化系病、内分泌与代谢病、肾病、风湿病、传染病)] 10[医学] 

主  题:Sickle Cell Anemia Tissue Doppler QT Dispersion Bahrain 

摘      要:Background: QT dispersion (QTd) varies according to heterogeneity of recovery time in the myocardium, and the impact of iron overload on the QTd in adult patients with Sickle Cell Disease (SCD) is not clear. Aim: This cross-sectional study was designed to evaluate corrected QTc interval and QTd on 12 leads ECG in patients with SCD, and assess the LV systolic and diastolic function using Pulsed Doppler Echocardiogram. Method: All patients were evaluated clinically with pulse Doppler echocardiography. Twelve leads ECG were taken to measure QTd and QTc. Blood samples withdrawn to assess the blood level of ferritin and hemoglobin. Pearson correlation coefficient was used to measure the linear relationship between serum ferritin and QTd. Results: The study included patients with SCD (n = 70, age 15.7 ± 8.9 years), compared with age-matched healthy control group (n = 70, age 15.9 ± 8.9 years). In patients with SCD compared with healthy control group the QTc (msec) 416 ± 23.21 ms vs. 401 ± 24.12 (p = 0.75), and the QTd were slightly longer in SCD compared with the control of 43 ± 22.1 vs. 38 ± 20.16 msec, (p = 0.071) with no significant difference. M mode echo showed that SCD patients compared with control had higher LVMI gm/M2 of 105 ± 10.3 vs. 83 ± 7.1, P = 0.001, larger LV end diastolic dimension (cm) of 5.5 ± 0.32 vs. 4.72 ± 0.35, p = 0.03, RV diameter (cm) of 2.8 ± 0.42 vs. 2.4 ± 0.31, (p = 0.041) and RV wall thickness (mm) of 0.31 ± 0.06 vs. 0.28 ± 0.03, (p = 0.024). Pulsed Doppler showed high LV transmitral E wave velocity of 85.23 ± 1.92 vs. 62.43 ± 1.67 m/s (p = 0.001), A wave (msec) 46.26 ± 4.7 vs. 56.24 ± 3.2 m/s, p = 0.032, with E/A ratio of 1.86 ± 0.01 vs. 1.10 ± 0.03, (p = 0.024) and DT of E wave (msec) of 156.43 ± 23.5 vs. 189.87 ± 19.5, (p = 0.031). Left ventricle ejection fraction percentage was similar between both groups, but SCD had significantly higher right ventricle tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion TAPSE (cm) of 1.23 ± 0.21 vs. 1.11 ± 0.23

读者评论 与其他读者分享你的观点

用户名:未登录
我的评分