咨询与建议

看过本文的还看了

相关文献

该作者的其他文献

文献详情 >Effectiveness of a Patient-Spe... 收藏

Effectiveness of a Patient-Specific Immobilization and Positioning System to Limit Interfractional Translation and Rotation Setup Errors in Radiotherapy of Prostate Cancers

Effectiveness of a Patient-Specific Immobilization and Positioning System to Limit Interfractional Translation and Rotation Setup Errors in Radiotherapy of Prostate Cancers

作     者:Gilbert Law Ronnie Leung Frankle Lee Hollis Luk Ka Chai Lee Frank Wong Matthew Wong Steven Cheung Venus Lee Wing Ho Mui Mark Chan Gilbert Law;Ronnie Leung;Frankle Lee;Hollis Luk;Ka Chai Lee;Frank Wong;Matthew Wong;Steven Cheung;Venus Lee;Wing Ho Mui;Mark Chan

作者机构:Department of Clinical Oncology Tuen Mun Hospital Hong Kong China 

出 版 物:《International Journal of Medical Physics, Clinical Engineering and Radiation Oncology》 (医学物理学、临床工程、放射肿瘤学(英文))

年 卷 期:2016年第5卷第3期

页      面:184-195页

学科分类:0502[文学-外国语言文学] 050201[文学-英语语言文学] 05[文学] 

主  题:Immobilization Prostate CBCT Margin Interfractional Motion 

摘      要:Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of a patient-specific immobilization and positioning device in prostate radiotherapy. Methods: Eighty patients were immobilized and positioned by a patient-specific device. Prostate translations and rotations were estimated from daily cone beam computed tomography scans using a contour-based approach assisted by auto-registration and quantified by the group mean GM, systematic Σ and random σ errors. Dosimetric impacts of residual prostate rotations where the translation errors were corrected were evaluated by robustness plan analysis. Results: Using the patient-specific immobilization alone without online image-guidance, the GM, Σ and σ of the prostate translations were 0.8, 1.7, and 1.5 mm (left-right;LR), 0.8, 2.1, and 1.9 mm (superior-inferior;SI), and 0.5, 1.7 and 1.5 mm (anterior-posterior;AP), while for the prostate rotations they were 0.0°, 0.6°, and 0.7°(pitch), 0.2°, 0.5°, and 0.6°(roll), and 0.2°, 0.5°, and 0.6°(yaw). The resulting van Herk’s margin was 5.8 (LR), 7.3 (SI) and 5.8 (AP) mm. With adaptive online image-guidance based on estimates from the first 5 fractions, Σ were reduced by 0.7 - 1.2 mm for the prostate translations, resulting in a margin reduction by 2 - 3.5 mm. Changes of Σ and σ in the prostate rotations were insignificant regardless of translation corrections. Dosimetric impacts of residual rotation errors were negligible if a 2 mm margin was applied. Conclusions: Our patient-specific immobilization system can effectively limit the prostate translations and rotations, which is important without 6D treatment couches or using ultrasound image-guidance without rotational corrections.

读者评论 与其他读者分享你的观点

用户名:未登录
我的评分