咨询与建议

看过本文的还看了

相关文献

该作者的其他文献

文献详情 >An Improvement of Pedestrian D... 收藏

An Improvement of Pedestrian Detection Method with Multiple Resolutions

An Improvement of Pedestrian Detection Method with Multiple Resolutions

作     者:Guodong Zhang Peilin Jiang Kazuyuki Matsumoto Minoru Yoshida Kenji Kita 

作者机构:Faculy and School of Engineering Tokushima University Tokushima Japan Xi’an Jiaotong University Xian China 

出 版 物:《Journal of Computer and Communications》 (电脑和通信(英文))

年 卷 期:2017年第5卷第9期

页      面:102-116页

学科分类:081203[工学-计算机应用技术] 08[工学] 0835[工学-软件工程] 0812[工学-计算机科学与技术(可授工学、理学学位)] 

主  题:Deformable Part Model Pedestrian Detection Multi-Resolution Latent SVM 

摘      要:In object detection, detecting an object with 100 pixels is substantially different from detecting an object with 10 pixels. Many object detection algorithms assume that the pedestrian scale is fixed during detection, such as the DPM detector. However, detectors often give rise to different detection effects under the circumstance of different scales. If a detector is used to perform pedestrian detection in different scales, the accuracy of pedestrian detection could be improved. A multi-resolution DPM pedestrian detection algorithm is proposed in this paper. During the stage of model training, a resolution factor is added to a set of hidden variables of a latent SVM model. Then, in the stage of detection, a standard DPM model is used for the high resolution objects and a rigid template is adopted in case of the low resolution objects. In our experiments, we find that in case of low resolution objects the detection accuracy of a standard DPM model is lower than that of a rigid template. In Caltech, the omission ratio of a multi-resolution DPM detector is 52% with 1 false positive per image (1FPPI);and the omission ratio rises to 59% (1FPPI) as far as a standard DPM detector is concerned. In the large-scale sample set of Caltech, the omission ratios given by the multi-resolution and the standard DPM detectors are 18% (1FPPI) and 26% (1FPPI), respectively.

读者评论 与其他读者分享你的观点

用户名:未登录
我的评分