咨询与建议

看过本文的还看了

相关文献

该作者的其他文献

文献详情 >Improving Curve Number Runoff ... 收藏

Improving Curve Number Runoff Estimates Using Dual Hydrologic Soil Classification and Potential Contributing Source Areas Delineation Methods

Improving Curve Number Runoff Estimates Using Dual Hydrologic Soil Classification and Potential Contributing Source Areas Delineation Methods

作     者:Katherine Miller Katherine Folk Clancy 

作者机构:College of Natural Resources University of Wisconsin at Stevens Point Stevens Point USA 

出 版 物:《Journal of Water Resource and Protection》 (水资源与保护(英文))

年 卷 期:2017年第9卷第1期

页      面:20-39页

学科分类:1002[医学-临床医学] 100214[医学-肿瘤学] 10[医学] 

主  题:Curve number Watershed Delineation Runoff 

摘      要:Runoff models such as the Curve Number (CN) model are dependent upon land use and soil type within the watershed or contributing area. In regions with internal drainage (e.g. wetlands) watershed delineation methods that fill sinks can result in inaccurate contributing areas and estimations of runoff from models such as the CN model. Two methods to account for this inaccuracy have been 1) to adjust the initial abstraction value within the CN model;or 2) to improve the watershed delineation in order to better account for internal drainage. We used a combined approach of examining the watershed delineation, and refining the CN model by the incorporating of dual hydrologic soil classifications. For eighteen watersheds within Wisconsin, we compared the CN model results of three watershed delineation methods to USGS gaged values. We found that for large precipitation events (100 mm) the CN model estimations are closer to observed values for watershed delineations that identify the directly connected watershed and use the undrained hydrologic soil classification.

读者评论 与其他读者分享你的观点

用户名:未登录
我的评分