Flotation of Brazilian and Colombian Coals Using a Negative Bias

作     者：Irineu Brum H. Villegas W. Banguero J. Guerrero C. Sampaio J. Barraza 

作者机构：Laboratorio de Processamento Mineral Centro de Tecnologia Universidad Federal Rio Grande do Sul Porto Alegre Brasil Escuela de Ingenierla Quimica Universidad del Valle Cali 25360 Colombia 

出 版 物：《Journal of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering》 (化学与化工（英文版）)

年 卷 期：2013年第7卷第2期

页      面：170-174页

学科分类：081702[工学-化学工艺] 081901[工学-采矿工程] 0819[工学-矿业工程] 08[工学] 0817[工学-化学工程与技术] 

主　　题：Negative bias column flotation coal. 

摘      要：Brazil and Colombia have large reserves of coal. Those reserves in Brazil are located predominantly in the south and the main reserves in Colombia are located in the north. Despite the relative ease of exploitation, these resources have been underestimated as a source of energy. Currently, these countries are developing projects and partnerships aiming to qualify this mineral resource, adding quality to the final product of the processing plants. In this scenario, the processing of Brazilian and Colombian coal in flotation columns appears as a promising alternative, having been successful in mineral systems containing fine particles. The paper aims to study the overall process of column flotation for a specific Brazilian coal and a specific Colombian coal. The material used in this study consists of fine coal from Brazil （Copelmi） and Colombia （Cerrejon）. The objective is to recover carbonaceous matter and reduce the ash and contaminants grade. The two coals were floated using a negative bias in a 5 cm diameter conventional flotation column of 5 m high. Flotation parameter investigated included air velocity in the range 0.6 to 1.5 cm/s. For all runs, a constant negative bias of-0.25 cm/s and a pulp concentration of 8% w/w were used. For Cerrej6n coal, 300 g/ton of frother and 907 g/ton of collector was used, whereas for Copelmi coal, 600 g/ton of frother and 1,815 g/ton of collector was employed. The frother was a commercial Aerofroth 65 （AF65）, whereas the collector was Kerosene. For the Colombian coal, in general, yield, organic recovery, ash recovery and water recovery decreased with the increasing air rate. However, for Brazilian coal the air rate had no significant effect. For Colombian coal, the highest yield （60% w/w） and organic recovery （69% w/w） were obtained at the lowest air rate （0.6 cm/s）.