咨询与建议

看过本文的还看了

相关文献

该作者的其他文献

文献详情 >Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for g... 收藏

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer. Is it a must or a fake?

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer. Is it a must or a fake?

作     者:Rossella Reddavid Silvia Sofia Paolo Chiaro Fabio Colli Renza Trapani Laura Esposito Mario Solej Maurizio Degiuli 

作者机构:Surgical Oncology and Digestive Surgery Department of Oncology University of Turin San Luigi University Hospital Department of Surgical Sciences Digestive and Oncological Surgery University of Turin Molinette Hospital 

出 版 物:《World Journal of Gastroenterology》 (世界胃肠病学杂志(英文版))

年 卷 期:2018年第24卷第2期

页      面:274-289页

核心收录:

学科分类:1002[医学-临床医学] 100201[医学-内科学(含:心血管病、血液病、呼吸系病、消化系病、内分泌与代谢病、肾病、风湿病、传染病)] 10[医学] 

基  金:FFCD FNCLCC Federation Francophone de Cancerologie Digestive Federation Nationale des Centres de Lutte contre le Cancer Medical Research Council Adjuvant Gastric Infusional Chemotherapy 

主  题:gastric cancer neoadjuvant chemotherapy perioperative chemotherapy D2 lymphadenectomy randomized control trial 

摘      要:AIM To investigate the neoadjuvant chemotherapy(NAC) effect on the survival of patients with proper stomach cancer submitted to D2 *** We proceeded to a review of the literature with Pub Med, Embase, ASCO and ESMO meeting abstracts as well as computerized use of the Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials(RCTs) comparing NAC followed by surgery(NAC + S) with surgery alone(SA) for gastric cancer(GC). The primary outcome was the overall survival rate. Secondary outcomes were the site of the primary tumor, extension of node dissection according to Japanese Gastric Cancer Association(JGCA) performed in both arms, disease-specific(DSS) and disease-free survival(DFS) rates, clinical and pathological response rates and resectability rates after perioperative treatment. RESULTS We identified a total of 16 randomized controlled trials comparing NAC + S(n = 1089) with SA(n = 973) published in the period from January 1993-March 2017. Only 6 of these studies were well-designed, structured trials in which the type of lymph node(LN) dissection performed or at least suggested in the trial protocol was reported. Two out of three of the RCTs with D2 lymphadenectomy performed in almost all cases failed to show survival benefit in the NAC arm. Inthe third RCT, the survival rate was not even reported, and the primary end points were the clinical outcomes of surgery with and without NAC. In the remaining three RCTs, D2 lymph node dissection was performed in less than 50% of cases or only recommended in the Study Treatment protocol without any description in the results of the procedure really perfomed. In one of the two studies, the benefit of NAC was evident only for esophagogastric junction(EGJ) cancers. In the second study, there was no overall survival benefit of NAC. In the last trial, which documented a survival benefit for the NAC arm, the chemotherapy effect was mostly evident for EGJ cancer, and more than one-fourth of patients did not have a proper

读者评论 与其他读者分享你的观点