Comparison of efficacy and safety between standard-dose and modified-dose FOLFIRINOX as a first-line treatment of pancreatic cancer

作     者：Huapyong Kang Jung Hyun Jo Hee Seung Lee Moon Jae Chung Seungmin Bang Seung Woo Park Si Young Song Jeong Youp Park 

作者机构：Division of Gastroenterology Department of Internal Medicine Yonsei University College of Medicine 

出 版 物：《World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology》 (世界胃肠肿瘤学杂志（英文版）（电子版）)

年 卷 期：2018年第10卷第11期

页      面：421-430页

核心收录：

学科分类：10[医学] 

主　　题：Dose modification Adverse event Pancreatic cancer Adenocarcinoma FOLFIRINOX Chemotherapy 

摘      要：AIM To directly compare the efficacy and toxicity of standarddose FOLFIRINOX(sFOLFIRINOX) and modified-dose FOLFIRINOX(mFOLFIRINOX, 75% of standard-dose) for pancreatic *** One hundred and thirty pancreatic cancer patients who received sFOLFIRINOX(n = 88) or mFOLFIRINOX(n = 42) as their first-line chemotherapy from January 2013 to July 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. For efficacy analysis, the objective response rate(ORR),disease control rate(DCR), progression-free survival(PFS), and overall survival(OS) were evaluated and compared using Pearson s chi-square test, Kaplan-Meier plot and log-rank test. The adverse events(AEs) were evaluated, and severe(≥ grade 3) AEs rates of the two groups were compared for toxicity *** The mFOLFIRINOX group included more female patients(30.7% vs 57.1%; P = 0.004) and older patients [age(median), 57 vs 63.5; P = 0.018] than the sFOLFIRINOX group. In the efficacy analysis, the ORR and DCR were not significantly different between the two groups(ORR: 39.8% vs 35.7%; P = 0.656; DCR: 80.7% vs 83.3%; P = 0.716). The median PFS and OS were also not different between the groups(PFS: 8.7 mo vs 8.1 mo, P = 0.272; OS: 13.9 mo vs 13.7 mo, P = 0.476). In the safety analysis with severe AEs, the rates of neutropenia(83.0% vs 66.7%; P = 0.044), anorexia(48.9% vs 28.6%; P = 0.029) and diarrhea(13.6% vs 0.0%; P = 0.009) were markedly lower in the mFOLFIRINOX *** m FOLFIRINOX showed comparable efficacy but better safety compared to sFOLFIRINOX. If clinically necessary, initiating FOLFIRINOX with 75% of the standard-dose can alleviate toxicity concerns without compromising efficacy.