MAPPING PARADIGMS OF EUROPEAN INTERNET REGULATION： THE EXAMPLE OF INTERNET CONTENT CONTROL

作     者：Michael W. Mǖller 

作者机构：Law Clerk Higher Regional Court of Munich Munich 80335 Germany 

出 版 物：《Frontiers of Law in China-Selected Publications from Chinese Universities》 (中国高等学校学术文摘·法学（英文版）)

年 卷 期：2018年第13卷第3期

页      面：329-341页

学科分类：120202[管理学-企业管理（含：财务管理、市场营销、人力资源管理）] 12[管理学] 1202[管理学-工商管理] 1201[管理学-管理科学与工程(可授管理学、工学学位)] 08[工学] 081201[工学-计算机系统结构] 0812[工学-计算机科学与技术（可授工学、理学学位）] 

主　　题：internet regulation internet content control regulatory paradigms 

摘      要：The article introduces three of the paradigms used to analyze intemet regulation and applies them to the history of internet content control in Europe. It builds on Thomas Kuhn＇s notion of paradigms and previous works on regulatory theory, defining regulatory paradigms as a ＂shared understanding of the purpose of regulation, of the way of thinking about how regulation works, and of the set of institutional arrangements and instruments through which regulation is conducted.＂ Building on this definition, the prevalent concepts of the paradigms of intemet regulation refer to the intention, mechanisms, and the intensity of regulation. The article discusses these concepts with regard to the regulation of interact content control in Europe and analyzes three paradigm shifts that have taken place since the early days of the intemet. These paradigm shifts concern the responsiveness, differentiation, and intensity of regulation.