咨询与建议

看过本文的还看了

相关文献

该作者的其他文献

文献详情 >Intervention of Mirtazapine on... 收藏

Intervention of Mirtazapine on gemcitabine-induced mild cachexia in nude mice with pancreatic carcinoma xenografts

Intervention of Mirtazapine on gemcitabine-induced mild cachexia in nude mice with pancreatic carcinoma xenografts

作     者:Shu-Man Jiang Jian-Hua Wu Lin Jia 

作者机构:Department of Gastro-enterologyGuangzhou Nan Sha Center HospitalGuangzhouFirst Municipal People's Hospital Affiliated with the GuangzhouMedical CollegeGuangzhou 510180Guangdong ProvinceChina 

出 版 物:《World Journal of Gastroenterology》 (世界胃肠病学杂志(英文版))

年 卷 期:2012年第18卷第22期

页      面:2867-2871页

核心收录:

学科分类:090601[农学-基础兽医学] 081702[工学-化学工艺] 08[工学] 0817[工学-化学工程与技术] 09[农学] 0906[农学-兽医学] 

主  题:Pancreatic carcinoma Cachexia Mirtazap-ine Gemcitabine Antidepressant 

摘      要:AIM: To investigate the effect of Mirtazapine on tumor growth, food intake, body weight, and nutritional status in gemcitabine-induced mild cachexia. METHODS: Fourteen mice with subcutaneous xenografts of a pancreatic cancer cell line (SW1990) were randomly divided into Mirtazapine and control groups. Either Mirtazapine (10 mg/kg) or saline solution was orally fed to the mice every day after tumor implantation. A model of mild cachexia was then established in both groups by intraperitoneal injection of Gemcitabine (50 mg/kg) 10 d, 13 d, and 16 d after tumor implanta- tion. Tumor size, food intake, body weight, and nutritional status were measured during the experiment. All mice were sacrificed at day 28. RESULTS: (1) After 7 d of gemcitabine administration, body-weight losses of 5%-7% which suggested mild cachexia were measured; (2) No significant difference in tumor size was detected between the Mirtazapine and control groups (P 0.05); and (3) During the entire experimental period, food intake and body weight were slightly greater for the Mirtazapine group compared with controls (although these differences were not statistically significant). After 21 d, mice in the Mirtazapine group consumed significantly more food than control mice (3.95 ± 0.14 g vs 3.54 ± 0.10 g, P = 0.004). After 25 d, mice in the Mirtazapine group were also significantly heavier than control mice (17.24 ± 0.53 g vs 18.05 ± 0.68 g, P = 0.014). CONCLUSION: Mild cachexia model was successfully established by gemcitabine in pancreatic tumor-bearing mice. Mirtazapine can improve gemcitabine-induced mild cachexia in pancreatic tumor-bearing mice. It was believed to provide a potential therapeutic perspective for further studies on cachexia.

读者评论 与其他读者分享你的观点

用户名:未登录
我的评分