咨询与建议

看过本文的还看了

相关文献

该作者的其他文献

文献详情 >Comparative Analysis of High-R... 收藏

Comparative Analysis of High-Rise Reinforced Concrete Structures According to International Seismic Design Codes

Comparative Analysis of High-Rise Reinforced Concrete Structures According to International Seismic Design Codes

作     者:Dia Eddin Nassani Ali Khalid Hussein 

作者机构:Department of Civil Engineering Hasan Kalyoncu University Gaziantep 27410 Turkey Faculty of Civil Engineering Gaziantep University Gaziantep 27410 Turkey 

出 版 物:《Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture》 (土木工程与建筑(英文版))

年 卷 期:2016年第10卷第2期

页      面:211-218页

学科分类:070801[理学-固体地球物理学] 07[理学] 08[工学] 081402[工学-结构工程] 0708[理学-地球物理学] 081304[工学-建筑技术科学] 0813[工学-建筑学] 0814[工学-土木工程] 

主  题:High-rise building seismic load building codes. 

摘      要:The field of earthquake engineering and seismology is of great importance to structural engineers around the world. The location, size and consequences of an earthquake are variable depending on several conditions. Surface conditions, boundary/fault type, distance from the boundary and hypocenter are all elements that dictate the outcome of a seismic event. The paper presents a comparison of seismic provisions of two seismic design codes--EC8 (Eurocode 8) and IBC (International Building Code) 2006, to a high-rise reinforced concrete building. The building is irregular and composes of 20 floors. The equivalent lateral force analysis was performed using the well-known structure program--ETABS (Extended 3D Analysis of Building Systems). Based on the analysis results (inter-storey index, global damage index, storey displacement, inter-storey drift ratio and base shear), EC8 was found to be conservative when compared with IBC 2006. The conclusion is that for the design and analysis of high-rise reinforced concrete buildings with certain irregularity, EC8 provisions were considered to be conservative.

读者评论 与其他读者分享你的观点

用户名:未登录
我的评分