Comparison of continuous homogenous azeotropic and pressure-swing distillation for a minimum azeotropic system ethyl acetate/nhexane separation
Comparison of continuous homogenous azeotropic and pressure-swing distillation for a minimum azeotropic system ethyl acetate/nhexane separation作者机构:Key Laboratory of Gas Process Engineering School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering Southwest Petroleum University School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering Yangtze Normal University
出 版 物:《Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering》 (中国化学工程学报(英文版))
年 卷 期:2018年第26卷第10期
页 面:2023-2033页
核心收录:
学科分类:081704[工学-应用化学] 08[工学] 0817[工学-化学工程与技术] 081701[工学-化学工程]
基 金:Supported by the Education Foundation of Chongqing(KJ1712307) the Application Technology Research and Developments Foundation of Fuling Technology Board(FLKJ,2016ABA1026) the Young Foundation of Yangtze Normal University(2015XJXM03)
主 题:Continuous homogenous azeotropic distillation Pressure-swing distillation Ethyl acetate/n-hexane Azeotrope
摘 要:Continuous homogenous azeotropic distillation(CHAD) and pressure-swing distillation(PSD) are explored to separate a minimum-boiling azeotropic system of ethyl acetate and n-hexane. The CHAD process with acetone as the entrainer and the PSD process with the pressures of 0.1 MPa and 0.6 MPa in two columns are designed and simulated by Aspen Plus. The operating conditions of the two processes are optimized via a sequential modular approach to obtain the minimum total annual cost(TAC). The computational results show that the partially heat integrated pressure-swing distillation(HIPSD) has reduced in the energy cost and TAC by 40.79% and 35.94%, respectively, than the conventional PSD, and has more greatly reduced the energy cost and TAC by 62.61% and 49.26% respectively compared with the CHAD process. The comparison of CHAD process and partially HIPSD process illustrates that the partially HIPSD has more advantages in averting the product pollution, energy saving, and economy.