利用羊水量对分娩时进行评估的一项随机临床试验:羊水指数与单一最大羊水暗区检测技术比较
A randomized clinical trial of the intrapartum assessment of amniotic fluid volume: Amniotic fluid index versus the single deepest pocket technique作者机构：Depts. of Obstetric s and Gynecology Univ. of Mississippi Medical Center Jackson Miss Univ. W. A.Spartanburg SC United States Dr.
出 版 物：《世界核心医学期刊文摘（妇产科学分册）》 (Core Journal in Obstetrics/Gynecology)
年 卷 期：2005年第1卷第1期
页 面：9-9页
学科分类：1002[医学-临床医学] 100211[医学-妇产科学] 10[医学]
主 题：羊水暗区 羊水指数 羊水量 随机临床试验 晚期减速 胎儿窘迫 变异减速 评估组
摘 要：Objective The purpose of this study was to determine whether an intra partum as sessment of amniotic fluid identifies a pregnancy that is at risk for an adverse outcome. Study design Parturients who were admitted for delivery were assigned randomly to have the amniotic fluid assessed either by amniotic fluid index or b y the presence of a 2 ×1 pocket. Results The amniotic fluid index was obtained in 499 pregnancies, and the 2 ×1 technique was performed in 501. Oligohydramnio s was diagnosed in 25%of amniotic fluid index pregnancies versus 8%with the us e of the 2 ×1 pocket technique (P .001). Both techniques failed to identify p atients who underwent an amnioinfusion for fetal distress (P=.864) or who experi enced variable (P=.208) or late decelerations (P=.210) that influenced delivery, fetal distress in labor (P=.220), caesarean delivery for fetal distress (P=.133 ), and admission to neonatal intensive care unit (P=.686). Conclusion Neither th e amniotic fluid index nor the 2 ×1 pocket technique that was undertaken as a f etal admission test identi fies a pregnancy that is at risk for an adverse outco me.
维普期刊数据库
同方期刊数据库