The Interface Between Pragmatics and Conversation Analysis

作     者：Paul Drew Paul Drew

作者机构：Loughborough University UK 

出 版 物：《外国语》 (Journal of Foreign Languages)

年 卷 期：2018年第41卷第1期

页      面：2-22页

核心收录：

学科分类：0303[法学-社会学] 0501[文学-中国语言文学] 050102[文学-语言学及应用语言学] 03[法学] 030303[法学-人类学] 05[文学] 

主　　题：conversation analysis sequential approach empirical complement pragmatics 

摘      要：In his authoritative and brilliant account of Pragmatics,Levinson(1983)included Conversation Analysis(CA)firmly as part of *** have perhaps been more cautious,even sceptical,about whether CA is really relevant to the Pragmatics programme;and it has to be said that some conversation analysts have been rather stand-offish about being associated with Pragmatics,regarding CA’s programme as very different from that of *** there are many differences and divergences between CA and Pragmatics,my own view is that CA shares with Pragmatics a number of focal interests that lie at or close to the heart of *** I will explore some connections between them,focusing on the contributions CA makes to our understanding of the pragmatics of language use,especially in three of the foundational areas of Pragmatics—namely Implicature(*** Grice 1975),Speech Acts(social action)(*** Austin 1962 and Searle 1969)and Presupposition and Well-Formedness(*** Lakoff1971).I will show examples that demonstrate the distinctiveness of CA’s approach to these core pragmatic aspects of language use—in the spirit of demonstrating how CA’s approach complements and does not detract from approaches in Pragmatics.