咨询与建议

看过本文的还看了

相关文献

该作者的其他文献

文献详情 >Discrete and continuum modelin... 收藏

Discrete and continuum modeling of granular flow in silo discharge

Discrete and continuum modeling of granular flow in silo discharge

作     者:Tian Tian Jinglin Su Jinhui Zhan Shujun Geng Guangwen Xu Xiaoxing Liu 

作者机构:State Key Laboratory of Multi-Phase Complex System Institute of Process Engineering Chinese Academy of Science Beijing 100190 China University of Chinese Academy ofSdences Beijing 100049 China Sino-Danish Center for Education and Research Beijing 100190 China 

出 版 物:《Particuology》 (颗粒学报(英文版))

年 卷 期:2018年第16卷第1期

页      面:127-138页

核心收录:

学科分类:07[理学] 08[工学] 070104[理学-应用数学] 0813[工学-建筑学] 0701[理学-数学] 081301[工学-建筑历史与理论] 

基  金:This work is supported financially by the National Natural Science Foundation of China  grant No. 21576265. Xiaoxing Liu acknowledges the financial support from the Hundred Talents Pro- gram of Chinese Academy of Sciences 

主  题:Silo Flow pattern Discharge rate Discrete-element model Frictional viscosity model 

摘      要:Granular material discharge from a flat-bottomed silo has been simulated by using continuum modeling and a three-dimensional discrete-element method (DEM). The predictive abilities of three commonly used frictional viscosity models (Schaeffer, S-S, and μ(I)) were evaluated by comparing them with the DEM data. The funnel-flow pattern (type C) and the semi-mass-flow pattern (type B) that was predicted by DEM simulations can be represented when the Schaeffer orμ(I) model is used, whereas the S-S model gives a consistent type-B flow pattern. All three models over-estimate the discharge rate compared with the DEM. The profiles of the solids volume fraction and the vertical velocity above the outlet show that the larger discharge rates given by the Schaeffer and μ(I) model result from an over-estimation of volume fraction, whereas the deviation in the S-S model stems from the failure to predict a solid vertical velocity and a volume fraction.

读者评论 与其他读者分享你的观点

用户名:未登录
我的评分