The influence of treatment modality on illness perception and secondary prevention outcomes among patients with acute myocardial infarction
不同治疗方式对急性心肌梗死患者疾病认知及二级预防结局的影响作者机构:Faculty of NursingAmerican University of MadabaAmman Jordan Faculty of NursingAl-AlBayt UniversityP.O.Box:130040Al-Mafraq 25113Jordan Faculty of NursingThe Hashemite UniversityAl-ZarqaJordan Jordan University of Science and TechnologyIrbidJordan University of UlsterSchool of NursingUnited Kingdom Queen's University of BelfastUnited Kingdom
出 版 物:《International Journal of Nursing Sciences》 (国际护理科学(英文))
年 卷 期:2017年第4卷第3期
页 面:271-277页
学科分类:1002[医学-临床医学] 100201[医学-内科学(含:心血管病、血液病、呼吸系病、消化系病、内分泌与代谢病、肾病、风湿病、传染病)] 10[医学]
主 题:Acute myocardial infarction Illness perception Primary percutaneous coronary intervention Secondary prevention
摘 要:Objectives:This study aims to determine if patients with acute myocardial infarction differ in illness perception and secondary prevention outcomes depending on the treatment they ***:A repeated measures design was used to compare patients with acute myocardial infarction receiving three different treatment modalities:ST-elevation myocardial infarction treated by primary percutaneous coronary intervention,ST-elevation myocardial infarction treated by thrombolytic therapy,and non ST-elevation myocardial infarction treated by medication.A convenient sampling technique was used to recruit 206 patients with acute myocardial infarction who agreed to participate in the current *** illness perception,physical activity,and demographical and clinical data were collected during hospital admission and again at 6 ***:A total of 186 patients completed the *** showed that the primary percutaneous coronary intervention group perceived their illness as acute rather than chronic(P=0.034)and has lower personal control(P=0.032),higher treatment control(P=0.025),and higher perception of illness coherence(P=0.022)compared with patients receiving thrombolytic therapy and treated after non-ST segment ***,they report low control of their blood pressure(P=0.013)and less physical activity(P=0.001).Conclusion:The results of this study revealed that patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention had negative illness perception and limited behavioral changes 6 months after hospitalization in comparison with other treatment modalities such as percutaneous coronary intervention and thrombolytic *** research is recommended to confirm this association with longer follow-up study and among different cultures.