咨询与建议

看过本文的还看了

相关文献

该作者的其他文献

文献详情 >Usefulness of a novel slim typ... 收藏

Usefulness of a novel slim type Flush Knife-BT over conventional Flush Knife-BT in esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection

Usefulness of a novel slim type Flush Knife-BT over conventional Flush Knife-BT in esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection

作     者:Yoshiko Ohara Takashi Toyonaga Namiko Hoshi Shinwa Tanaka Shinichi Baba Hiroshi Takihara Fumiaki Kawara Tsukasa Ishida Yoshinori Morita Eiji Umegaki Takeshi Azuma 

作者机构:Division of GastroenterologyDepartment of Internal MedicineGraduate School of MedicineKobe University Department of EndoscopyKobe University Hospital Department of EndoscopyKishiwada Tokushukai Hospital 

出 版 物:《World Journal of Gastroenterology》 (世界胃肠病学杂志(英文版))

年 卷 期:2017年第23卷第9期

页      面:1657-1665页

核心收录:

学科分类:1002[医学-临床医学] 100210[医学-外科学(含:普外、骨外、泌尿外、胸心外、神外、整形、烧伤、野战外)] 10[医学] 

主  题:Endoscopic submucosal dissection Novel slim type ball-tipped FlushKnife Ball-tipped FlushKnife Resistance to knife insertion Water aspiration speed 

摘      要:To investigated the usefulness of a novel slim type ball-tipped FlushKnife (FlushKnife-BTS) over ball-tipped FlushKnife (FlushKnife-BT) in functional experiments and clinical *** order to evaluate the functionality of FlushKnife-BTS, water aspiration speed, resistance to knife insertion through the scope, and waterjet flushing speed were compared between FlushKnife-BTS and BT. In clinical practice, esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) performed using FlushKnife-BTS or BT by an experienced endoscopist between October 2015 and January 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. The treatment speed and frequency of removing and reinserting the knife to aspirate fluid and air during ESD sessions were *** experiments revealed that water aspiration speed by the endoscope equipped with a 2.8-mm working channel with FlushKnife-BTS was 7.7-fold faster than that with conventional FlushKnife-BT. Resistance to knife insertion inside the scope with a 2.8-mm working channel was reduced by 40% with FlushKnife-BTS. The waterjet flushing speed was faster with the use of FlushKnife-BT. In clinical practice, a comparison of 6 and 7 ESD using FlushKnife-BT and BTS, respectively, revealed that the median treatment speed was 25.5 mm2/min (range 19.6-30.3) in the BT group and 44.2 mm2/min (range 15.5-55.4) in the BTS group (P = 0.0633). However, the median treatment speed was significantly faster with FlushKnife-BTS when the resection size was larger than 1000 m2 (n = 4, median 24.2 mm2/min, range 19.6-27.7 vs n = 4, median 47.4 mm2/min, range 44.2-55.4, P = 0.0209). The frequency of knife replacement was less in the BTS group (median 1.76 times in one hour, range 0-5.45) than in the BT group (7.02 times in one hour, range 4.23-15) (P = 0.0065).CONCLUSIONOur results indicate that FlushKnife-BTS enhances the performance of ESD, particularly for large lesions, by improving air and fluid aspirat

读者评论 与其他读者分享你的观点

用户名:未登录
我的评分