A systematic review of active video games on rehabilitative outcomes among older patients
A systematic review of active video games on rehabilitative outcomes among older patients作者机构:School of KinesiologyUniversity of Minnesota Department of Applied Human SciencesUniversity of Minnesota-DuluthDuluthMN 55812USA
出 版 物:《Journal of Sport and Health Science》 (运动与健康科学(英文))
年 卷 期:2017年第6卷第1期
页 面:33-43页
核心收录:
学科分类:0403[教育学-体育学] 04[教育学] 1002[医学-临床医学] 1010[医学-医学技术(可授医学、理学学位)] 100215[医学-康复医学与理疗学] 10[医学]
主 题:Balance Depression Enjoyment Exergaming Physical functioning Quality of life
摘 要:Background: Although current research supports the use of active video games(AVGs) in rehabilitation, the evidence has yet to be systematically reviewed or synthesized. The current project systematically reviewed literature, summarized findings, and evaluated the effectiveness of AVGs as a therapeutic tool in improving physical, psychological, and cognitive rehabilitative outcomes among older adults with chronic ***: Seven databases(Academic Search Complete, Communication & Mass Media Complete, ERIC, Psyc INFO, Pub Med, SPORTDiscus,and Medline) were searched for studies that evaluated the effectiveness of AVG-based rehabilitation among older patients. The initial search yielded 946 articles; after evaluating against inclusion criteria and removing duplicates, 19 studies of AVG-based rehabilitation ***: Most studies were quasi-experimental in design, with physical functioning the primary outcome investigated with regard to the use of AVGs in rehabilitation. Overall, 9 studies found significant improvements for all study outcomes, whereas 9 studies were mixed, with significant improvements on several study outcomes but no effects observed on other outcomes after AVG-based treatments. One study failed to find any benefits of AVG-based ***: Findings indicate AVGs have potential in rehabilitation for older patients, with several randomized clinical trials reporting positive effects on rehabilitative outcomes. However, existing evidence is insufficient to support the advantages of AVGs over standard therapy. Given the limited number of studies and concerns with study design quality, more research is warranted to make more definitive conclusions regarding the ability of AVGs to improve rehabilitative outcomes in older patients.