咨询与建议

看过本文的还看了

相关文献

该作者的其他文献

文献详情 >An experimental investigation ... 收藏

An experimental investigation into modeling solids friction for fluidized dense-phase pneumatic transport of powders

An experimental investigation into modeling solids friction for fluidized dense-phase pneumatic transport of powders

作     者:G. Setia S.S. Mallick R. Pan P.W. Wypych 

作者机构:Department of Mechanical Engineering Thapar University Patiala Punjab 147004 India Fujian Longking Co. Ltd. 81 Lingyuan Road Longyan City Fujian 361000 China Faculty of Engineering University ofWollongong WoUongong NSW2522 Australia 

出 版 物:《Particuology》 (颗粒学报(英文版))

年 卷 期:2017年第15卷第1期

页      面:83-91页

核心收录:

学科分类:07[理学] 

基  金:Department of Science and Technology  Science and Engineering Research Board  Ministry of Science and Technology (Government oflndia) for financial assistance provided under the Young Scientist Scheme 

主  题:Fluidized dense phase Pneumatic transport Solids friction factor Scale up Volumetric loading ratio Dimensionless velocity 

摘      要:Results are presented of an ongoing investigation into modeling friction in fiuidized dense-phase pneumatic transport of bulk solids. Many popular modeling methods of the solids friction use the dimen- sionless solids loading ratio and Froude number. When evaluated under proper scale-up conditions of pipe diameter and length, many of these models have resulted in significant inaccuracy. A technique for modeling solids friction has been developed using a new combination of dimensionless numbers, volu- metric loading ratio and the ratio of particle free settling velocity to superficial conveying air velocity, to replace the solids loading ratio and Froude number. The models developed using the new formalism were evaluated for accuracy and stability under significant scale-up conditions for four different prod- ucts conveyed through four different test rigs (subject to diameter and length scale-up conditions). The new model considerably improves predictions compared with those obtained using the existing model, especially in the dense-phase region. Whereas the latter yields absolute average relative errors varying between 10% and 86%, the former yielded results with errors from 4% to 20% for a wide range of scale-up conditions. This represents a more reliable and narrower range of prediction that is suitable for industrial scale-up requirements.

读者评论 与其他读者分享你的观点

用户名:未登录
我的评分