Overview of the acupuncture parts in the Cochrane Database of systematic reviews and the Cochrane Collaboration
Cochrane系统评价数据库针灸相关资源概述（英文）作者机构：Experimental Research Center of Acupuncture Tianjin University of TCM Tianjin 300193 China
出 版 物：《World Journal of Acupuncture-Moxibustion》 (世界针灸杂志（英文版）)
年 卷 期：2016年第26卷第4期
页 面：50-60页
核心收录：
学科分类：1005[医学-中医学] 1002[医学-临床医学] 100512[医学-针灸推拿学] 10[医学]
基 金：Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China:81403494 81303025,reference number:2014CB543201
主 题：Cochrane Database systematic reviews acupuncture evidencebased medicine
摘 要：Background The clinical efficacy of acupuncture is a topic that has received worldwide attention. In recent years, the rise of evidence-based medicine has led to calls for the clinical curative effects of acupuncture to be tested through objective, standardized, systematic evaluation. The results of systematic reviews for clinical trials on the efficacy of acupuncture directly affect the development of acupuncture medicine. Because of its rigorous methods and its capability to provide the very latest results, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews（CDSR） is recognized worldwide as one of the most reliable sources for scientific evidence. Objective Assess the current system evaluation related to acupuncture in CDSR and the Cochrane Collaboration. Methods Based on the protocols described in the Cochrane library review and the Cochrane Collaboration, and considering the registered titles in the data base, the following key terms were selected： acupuncture, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, electroacupuncture, needle and acupressure. Results The 275 articles were retrieved. According to inclusion and exclusion criteria, 139 articles were eventually chosen for inclusion. We found a growing number of acupuncture related CDSR annual reviews and protocols on the overall Before 2014. The published acupuncture related reviews, protocols and registered titles concerning the subject involve 34 Cochrane Review Groups. Through analyzing the 84 reviews related to acupuncture, we concluded that these studies show a rather low rate of efficacy overall for acupuncture. Of the 84, 19（22.62%） concluded that there is evidence for the efficacy of acupuncture,2（2.38%） showed acupuncture treatment were not more effective than controls and the remaining 63（75.00%） showed that the efficacy of acupuncture were uncertain. Conclusions By analyzing and summarizing the acupuncture reviews published in the CDSR before 2014, we found that current research shows acupuncture treatment
维普期刊数据库
同方期刊数据库