Effectiveness and safety of first-generation protease inhibitors in clinical practice:Hepatitis C virus patients with advanced fibrosis
作者机构:CIBERehdInstituto de Salud Carlos Ⅲ28029 MadridSpain Unit for Clinical Management of Digestive DiseasesComplejo Hospitalario Universitario de Granada Instituto de Investigacion Biosanitaria de Granada University Hospital Politecnico La Fe Unit for Clinical Management of Digestive DiseasesUniversity Hospital Virgen Del Rocio Hospital Toledo University Clinic Hospital of Valencia University General Hospital of Valencia Unit for Clinical Management of Digestive DiseasesUniversity Hospital Nuestra Senora de Valme Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Agencia Sanitaria Costa del Sol University Hospital Cruces Gastroenterology UnitUniversity Hospital Fundacion Alcorcon University Hospital Virgen Macarena University Hospital Virgen de la Arrixaca Hospital of Leon University General Hospital Reina Sofia Department Gastroenterology and HepatologyUniversity Hospital Central de Asturias University Hospital Reina Sofia University Hospital De Gran Canaria Dr. Negrin Hospital San Pedro de Alcantara
出 版 物:《World Journal of Gastroenterology》 (世界胃肠病学杂志(英文版))
年 卷 期:2015年第21卷第30期
页 面:9163-9174页
核心收录:
学科分类:10[医学]
主 题:Hepatitis C Boceprevir Telaprevir First-generation protease inhibitors Advanced fibrosis
摘 要:AIM:To evaluates the effectiveness and safety of the first generation,NS3/4A protease inhibitors(PIs) in clinical practice against chronic C virus,especially in patients with advanced fibrosis. METHODS:Prospective study and non-experimental analysis of a multicentre cohort of 38 Spanish hospitals that includes patients with chronic hepatitis C genotype 1,treatment-na?ve(TN) or treatment-experienced(TE),who underwent triple therapy with the first generation NS3/4A protease inhibitors,boceprevir(BOC) and telaprevir(TVR),in combination with pegylated interferon and ribavirin. The patients were treatment in routine practice settings. Data on the study population and on adverse clinical and virologic effects were compiled during the treatment period and during follow ***:One thousand and fifty seven patients were included,405(38%) were treated with BOC and 652(62%) with TVR. Of this total,30%(n = 319) were TN and the remaining were TE:28%(n = 298) relapsers,12%(n = 123) partial responders(PR),25%(n = 260) null-responders(NR) and for 5%(n = 57) with prior response unknown. The rate of sustained virologic response(SVR) by intention-to-treatment(ITT) was greater in those treated with TVR(65%) than in those treated with BOC(52%)(P 0.0001),whereas by modified intention-to-treatment(m ITT) no were found significant differences. By degree of fibrosis,56% of patients were F4 and the highest SVR rates were recorded in the non-F4 patients,both TN and TE. In the analysis by groups,the TN patients treated with TVR by ITT showed a higher SVR(P = 0.005). However,by m ITT there were no significant differences between BOC and TVR. In the multivariate analysis by m ITT,the significant SVR factors were relapsers,IL28 B CC and non-F4; the type of treatment(BOC or TVR) was not significant. The lowest SVR values were presented by the F4-NR patients,treated with BOC(46%) or with TVR(45%). 28% of the patients interrupted the treatment,mainly by non-viral response(51%):this outcome was