咨询与建议

看过本文的还看了

相关文献

该作者的其他文献

文献详情 >Immunogenicity and immunizing ... 收藏

Immunogenicity and immunizing protection effect of GAMA gene DNA vaccine on Plasmodium berghei

Immunogenicity and immunizing protection effect of GAMA gene DNA vaccine on Plasmodium berghei

作     者:Feng Du Si Wang Chen Zhao Ya-Ming Cao En-Jie Luo 

作者机构:Department of Pathogen Biology Basic Medical College of China Medical University Inspection Institute of Jilin Medical College Department of Immunology Basic Medical College of China Medical University 

出 版 物:《Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Medicine》 (亚太热带医药杂志(英文版))

年 卷 期:2016年第9卷第2期

页      面:154-159页

核心收录:

学科分类:1002[医学-临床医学] 1001[医学-基础医学(可授医学、理学学位)] 100102[医学-免疫学] 10[医学] 

基  金:supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China(NSFC)(No.81471978) 

主  题:Malaria vaccine DNA vaccine Multi-stage vaccine GAMA Plasmodium berghei 

摘      要:Objective: To explore the effect of immunogenicity and immunizing protection of GAMA gene DNA vaccine, which was related with merozoite, ookinete and sporozoite invasion. Methods:Gene fragments were obtained using PCR technique and eukaryotic expression vector(containing immunostimulatory sequence) was built. BALB/c mice were divided into PBS control group, empty vector control group and study group and were immunized at week 0, 3 and 6 respectively. Blood was collected 2 weeks after each immunization and serum was separated to detect the Ig G, Ig G1 and Ig G2 a levels. Spleen of mice was obtained for preparation of splenic mononuclear cell and the cytokine IL-4 and IFN-αlevels were detected. Indirect immunofluorescence and western blot were employed to verify the specificity of antiserum. Sporozoite and merozoite invasion were used respectively to detect the immune protective effect 2 weeks after the third immunization. Ookinete conversion rate in vitro and oocyst numbers of mosquito stomach were observed to evaluate the transmission-blocking levels. Results: In GAMA DNA vaccine group: antiserum could be combined with recombinant protein specifically and green fluorescence signals of merozoite, ookinete and sporozoite were observable, while specific fragments and fluorescence signals were not observable in empty vector group. Compared with control group, specific Ig G in DNA vaccine immunity group significantly increased(P0.01), and Ig G1 and Ig G2 a all increased(P0.01). IL-4, IFN-αcontent in study group significantly increased, compared with control group(P0.01). GAMA DNA vaccine immunity could not obviously block the erythrocyte-stage infection(caused by sporozoite invasion); compared with control group, liver worm load was slightly reduced(P0.05), and antiserum ookinete numbers(cultured in vitro) had no significant difference with oocyst numbers of mosquito stomach in DNA vaccine group. Conclusions:GAMA has good antigenicity, which could stimulate the body to produce specific immune responses; while DNA vaccine immunity could not play a good protective effect, the effect of which is only limited to the slight reduction of liver worm load, and has no obvious erythrocytestage protective effect and transmission-blocking effect. Therefore, trying other immunization strategies for further research on the value of GAMA(as multi-stage antigen vaccine and multistage combined vaccine components of the life-cycle of plasmodium) is necessary.

读者评论 与其他读者分享你的观点

用户名:未登录
我的评分