Hepatitis C virus genotype 3: Meta-analysis on sustained virologic response rates with currently available treatment options

作     者：Javier Ampuero K Rajender Reddy Manuel Romero-Gomez 

作者机构：Inter-Centre Unit of Digestive Diseases and CIBERehd Virgen Macarena Virgen del Rocio University Hospitals University of Sevilla 41018 Sevilla Spain Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla 41018 Sevilla Spain Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Department of Medicine University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia PA 19107 United States 

出 版 物：《World Journal of Gastroenterology》 (世界胃肠病学杂志（英文版）)

年 卷 期：2016年第22卷第22期

页      面：5285-5292页

核心收录：

学科分类：1004[医学-公共卫生与预防医学(可授医学、理学学位)] 1002[医学-临床医学] 100401[医学-流行病与卫生统计学] 10[医学] 

主　　题：Hepatitis C Genotype 3 Sofosbuvir Daclatasvir Ledipasvir 

摘      要：AIM: To address the therapeutic efficacy of various treatment regimens in genotype 3 selecting randomized clinical trials and prospective National Cohort Studies.METHODS:(1) PEG-INF-based therapy including sofosbuvir(SOF) + RBV for 12 wk vs SOF + RBV 24 wk;(2) SOF + RBV therapy 12 wk/16 wk vs 24 wk; and(3) the role of RBV in SOF + daclatasvir(DCV) and SOF + ledipasvir(LDV) combinations. This metaanalysis provides robust information with the intention of addressing treatment strategy for hepatitis C virus genotype 3.RESULTS: A combination treatment including SOF + RBV + PEG-IFN for 12 wk notes better SVR than with only SOF + RBV for 12 wk, although its association with more frequent adverse effects may be a limiting factor. Longer duration therapy with SOF + RBV(24 wk) has achieved higher SVR rates than shorter durations(12 or 16 wk). SOF + LDV are not an ideal treatment for genotype 3. CONCLUSION: Lastly, SOF + DCV combination is probably the best oral therapy option and the addition of RBV does not appear to be needed to increase SVR rates substantially.