咨询与建议

看过本文的还看了

相关文献

该作者的其他文献

文献详情 >Comparison of three evapotrans... 收藏

Comparison of three evapotranspiration models with eddy covariance measurements for a Populus euphratica *** in an arid region of northwestern China

Comparison of three evapotranspiration models with eddy covariance measurements for a Populus euphratica Oliv. forest in an arid region of northwestern China

作     者:GAO Guanlong ZHANG Xiaoyou YU Tengfei LIU Bing 

作者机构:Cold and Arid Regions Environmental and Engineering Research Institute Chinese Academy of Sciences 

出 版 物:《Journal of Arid Land》 (干旱区科学(英文版))

年 卷 期:2016年第8卷第1期

页      面:146-156页

核心收录:

学科分类:0907[农学-林学] 08[工学] 0829[工学-林业工程] 09[农学] 

基  金:supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(41271037) the Youth Foundation of National Natural Science of China(41401033) 

主  题:evapotranspiration Penman-Monteith model Shuttleworth-Wallace model SSW model 

摘      要:The accurate estimation of evapotranspiration (ET) in arid regions is important for improving the water use efficiency of vegetation. Based on successive observations from May to October of 2014, we estimated the ET of a Populus euphratica Oliv. forest during the growing season in an extremely arid region using the PM (Penman-Monteith), SW (Shuttleworth-Wallace) and SSW (an improved canopy transpiration model) models. Estimated ET values were compared with those of the eddy covariance measurements. Results indicated that the actual ET of the P. euphratica forest was always overestimated by the PM model. The accuracy of the SW model was higher than that of the PM model. However, some data were not easily obtained because of the complicated structure of the SW model. The newly proposed SSW model gave the most accurate ET values, and its accuracy was higher at hourly than at daily time scale. In conclusion, the SSW model is more suitable for sparse vegetation system at large scales in extremely arid regions.

读者评论 与其他读者分享你的观点

用户名:未登录
我的评分