Later Wittgenstein's Rule-following Paradox and Chinese Philosophy of Meaning
Later Wittgenstein’s Rule-following Paradox and Chinese Philosophy of Meaning作者机构:National Research Centre for Foreign Language Education Beijing Foreign Studies University Hefei Normal University
出 版 物:《学术界》 (Academics)
年 卷 期:2016年第4期
页 面:298-302页
核心收录:
学科分类:01[哲学] 0101[哲学-哲学] 010103[哲学-外国哲学] 010102[哲学-中国哲学]
主 题:rule-following paradox Chinese philosophy language games indeterminacy of meaning
摘 要:Rule-following paradox in Philosophical Investigations remains a hot philosophical issue through which Wittgenstein promotes its intimate association with such core concepts like language games,meaning- is- use and private *** paradoxical way of explicating meaning is echoed in Chinese traditional *** paper discusses how Wittgenstein’ s puzzle of meaning is touched upon and dissolved by Chinese traditional philosophy well expressed in Zhuangzi’ s On the Uniformity of All Things(齐物论),Sengzhao’ s Immovability of Thing(物不迁),and Gongsun Long’ s White Horse Dialogue(白马论),which all highlight determinacy in the indeterminacy of meaning.