咨询与建议

看过本文的还看了

相关文献

该作者的其他文献

文献详情 >Making National History with L... 收藏

Making National History with Literary History: Hegel's Influence via Taine on Meiji Japan and the Late Qing and Early Republican China

Making National History with Literary History: Hegel's Influence via Taine on Meiji Japan and the Late Qing and Early Republican China

作     者:LIN Shaoyang 

作者机构:Department of Interdisciplinary Cultural Studies Graduate School of Arts and Sciences TheUniversity of Tokyo Tokyo 153-8902 Japan 

出 版 物:《Frontiers of Literary Studies in China-Selected Publications from Chinese Universities》 (中国高等学校学术文摘·文学研究(英文版))

年 卷 期:2015年第9卷第2期

页      面:160-189页

学科分类:01[哲学] 0101[哲学-哲学] 010103[哲学-外国哲学] 060205[历史学-中国近代史] 06[历史学] 0602[历史学-中国史] 

主  题:the establishment of national history Chinese and Japanese literaryhistory Hegel Hippolyte Taine nationalism 

摘      要:Through analyzing Hegel's influence via Taine on Meiji Japan and later, on the late Qing and early Republican China, this paper will shed lights on the process of the making of national history with literary history in modem Japan and its influences on modem China. It argues that the simultaneous establishment of modem Japanese historiography and the writing of literary history in Japan had a direct impact on the establishment of Chinese historiography in the late Qing, and the writing of Chinese literary history in twentieth-century China. It will focus more on the philosophical ideas of Taine and Hegel and their influence in Japanese literary historiography and, due to the limited length of this paper, only by extension, that of China as well. The primary focus of this paper is the interaction of the modem Japanese and Chinese pursuit of new historical narratives in the construction of new national and cultural identities in the context of global modernity. It also stresses that, an invisible "origin," the writing of Chinese (literary) history in the early twentieth-century, ironically, directly and indirectly, has been internalized by the writing of Japanese national history in an exclusive framework of nation-building.

读者评论 与其他读者分享你的观点

用户名:未登录
我的评分