咨询与建议

看过本文的还看了

相关文献

该作者的其他文献

文献详情 >Prasugrel versus clopidogrel i... 收藏

Prasugrel versus clopidogrel in acute coronary syndrome patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Prasugrel versus clopidogrel in acute coronary syndrome patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

作     者:张步春 车文良 刘伟静 徐亚伟 

作者机构:Department of Cardiology Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital Tongji University School of Medicine 

出 版 物:《South China Journal of Cardiology》 (岭南心血管病杂志(英文版))

年 卷 期:2010年第11卷第4期

页      面:238-245,249页

学科分类:1002[医学-临床医学] 100201[医学-内科学(含:心血管病、血液病、呼吸系病、消化系病、内分泌与代谢病、肾病、风湿病、传染病)] 10[医学] 

主  题:acute coronary syndrome meta-analysis prasugrel clopidogrel 

摘      要:Background Clopidogrel is beneficial after acute coronary syndrome. Recent studies suggest the superiority of prasugrel compared with clopidogrel. The enhanced platelet inhibition with prasugrel lead to a reduction in major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with moderate to high risk acute coronary syndrome scheduled for PCI. However, prasugrel showed signs of increased bleeding potential. We performed a meta-analysis to assess clinical safety and efficacy of prasugrel in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Methods We systematically searched PubMed, ISI Web of Knowledge, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, clinicaltrials. gov, proceedings of major US and European cardiology meetings, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) databases 2000-2010 and reviews, reference lists of relevant articles. The search strategy paired the term "prasugrel" "clopidogrel" with the following: "acute coronary syndrome" "percutaneous coronary intervention" We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized double-blind trials that evaluated clinical outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Two reviewers independently assessed the trials. Differences were resolved by consensus. Results A total of 2 trials with 14512 patients were available for analysis. Overall, prasugrel appeared significantly superior to clopidogrel for the risk of MACE (OR = 0.820.74-0.90, P ﹤0.0001), stent thrombosis (OR = 0.470.35-0.62, P 0.00001), death(OR = 0.850.78-0.93, P = 0.0003), and myocardial infarction (OR = 0.760.68-0.85, P﹤0.00001), without any significant difference in stroke (P = 0.85). However, major bleeding associated with non coronary artery bypass grafting Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction related to prasugrel (OR = 1.321.03-1.67, P = 0.03). Conclusions Prasugrel is superior to clopidogrel for acute coronary syndrome, while causing more bleedings.

读者评论 与其他读者分享你的观点

用户名:未登录
我的评分