Development and validation of an instrument to assess knowledge,attitudes,and practices on digital health among nursing officers

作     者：Maheshika Madhuwanthi Sunethra Jayathilake Neranga Liyanaarachchige Rohana Marasinghe Maheshika Madhuwanthi;Sunethra Jayathilake;Neranga Liyanaarachchige;Rohana Marasinghe

作者机构：Faculty of Graduate StudiesUniversity of Sri JayewardenepuraNugegodaSri Lanka Department of Nursing and MidwiferyFaculty of Allied Health SciencesUniversity of Sri JayewardenepuraNugegodaSri Lanka Sri Lanka College of Health InformaticsColomboSri Lanka Department of Medical EducationFaculty of Medical SciencesUniversity of Sri JayewardenepuraNugegodaSri Lanka 

出 版 物：《Frontiers of Nursing》 (护理前沿（英文）)

年 卷 期：2024年第11卷第3期

页      面：275-284页

学科分类：1011[医学-护理学（可授医学、理学学位）] 10[医学] 

基　　金：supported by the University of Sri Jayewardenepura(No. ASP/01/RE/AHS/2021/91) 

主　　题：assess development digital health instrument validations 

摘      要：Objective:Validation is an important aspect of an instrument,and it ensures the confidence of researchers to employ the instrument in their *** study was conducted to develop and validate an instrument to assess knowledge,attitudes,and practices(KAP) on digital health among nurses since digital health capacity is a major concern in health care that needs to be ***:We conducted a methodological study to assess the content validity and reliability of the ***,items were generated through a comprehensive literature review and by obtaining an expert ***,content and face validity were assessed by a panel of 7 *** the item-level content validity index(I-CVI) and the scale-level content validity index(S-CVI) were ***,test–retest reliability and internal consistency of the instrument were *** were analyzed using SPSS version ***:The initial pool consisted of 60 items and after obtaining content,face,and construct validity,51 items *** with an I-CVI 0.78 were considered *** S-CVI for relevancy,clarity,ambiguity,and simplicity were 0.93,0.91,0.94,and 0.92,*** subcomponents were constructed in each knowledge and attitudes domain,and the test–retest reliability test revealed that the instrument has good reliability,showing correlation coefficient values for the KAP domains and the total questionnaire of 0.76,0.98,0.99,and 0.99,*** independent Cronbach s α for all items was 0.76,indicating good internal ***:The present study established the acceptable validity and ensured the good reliability and internal consistency of the instrument,which can serve as an assessment tool of KAP on digital health among healthcare professionals.