Nasal flap preservation in endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy for nasolacrimal duct obstruction
作者机构:School of Medicine and Medical SciencesHoly Spirit University of KaslikP.O.Box 446JouniehLebanon Department of OphtalmologyEye and Ear Hospital InternationalNaccacheLebanon Applied Science Research CenterApplied Science Private UniversityAmman 11937Jordan
出 版 物:《International Journal of Ophthalmology(English edition)》 (国际眼科杂志(英文版))
年 卷 期:2024年第17卷第9期
页 面:1633-1638页
核心收录:
学科分类:1002[医学-临床医学] 100212[医学-眼科学] 10[医学]
主 题:nasolacrimal duct obstruction endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy mucosal flap
摘 要:AIM:To compare surgical outcomes between the conventional endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy(DCR)and a modified endoscopic DCR for the treatment of nasolacrimal duct obstruction(NLDO),and evaluate factors associated with the surgical success ***:Medical records of patients who underwent primary DCR surgery between January 2016 and July 2020 at the Otorhinolaryngology Department of Eye and Ear International Hospital,Lebanon were ***:The study group consisted of 50 consecutive modified endoscopic DCR and the control group consisted of 138 consecutive conventional endoscopic *** success rates at 1y were 98.0%(49 out of 50)for modified DCR,significantly higher compared to 84.8%(117/138)for the conventional DCR;there was no significant difference in the success rate throughout the years in terms of both surgical *** modified surgery vs traditional[adjusted odds ratio(aOR)=14.96]and having an adjunctive septoplasty surgery vs not(aOR=3.99)were significantly associated with higher odds of ***:Mucosal flap preservation and apposition shows significant improvement in the surgical success ***,there is no statistically significant difference found in terms of complication rate and mean operative time between the conventional and the modified techniques.