咨询与建议

看过本文的还看了

相关文献

该作者的其他文献

文献详情 >经皮冠状动脉血运重建及遵循指南强化药物治疗临床结果评估(CO... 收藏

经皮冠状动脉血运重建及遵循指南强化药物治疗临床结果评估(COURAGE)试验中的经济学方法

Economics methods in the Clinical Outcomes Utilizing percutaneous coronary Revascularization and Aggressive Guideline-driven drug Evaluation(COURAGE) trial

作     者:Weintraub W.S. Barnett P. 罗亮 

作者机构:Atlanta VA Medical Center Decatur GA United States Dr. 

出 版 物:《世界核心医学期刊文摘(心脏病学分册)》 (Digest of the World Core Medical Journals(Cardiology))

年 卷 期:2006年第2卷第11期

页      面:15-15页

学科分类:1002[医学-临床医学] 100201[医学-内科学(含:心血管病、血液病、呼吸系病、消化系病、内分泌与代谢病、肾病、风湿病、传染病)] 10[医学] 

主  题:COURAGE 药物治疗 经济学方法 基线水平 成本-效益 效用分析 保健系统 bootstrap 

摘      要:Percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI) remains a major therapeutic option for the treatment of chronic coronary artery disease. In the COURAGE trial, 2287 patients with chronic coronary disease were randomized between PCI with medical management and medical management alone. Embedded within the COURAGE trial is a detailed economic analysis being conducted in three health care systems: the US Veterans Administration(VA), Canada, and the US non-VA. Resource use and costs are being collected for each system and overall. Survival is assessed internally in the trial with mean follow-up of 4.5 years. Long-term mean survival will be estimated by projecting survival beyond the trial period by extrapolating the in-trial hazard rates. Utility is being assessed at baseline and at 1, 3, and 6 months and annually thereafter, using a computer-administered standard gamble. Quality-adjusted life years are calculated by multiplying survival by utility. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of PCI will be defined as the additional cost of PCI divided by the gain in life years and quality-adjusted life years. The 95%confidence regions of efficacy and costs will be determined by bootstrap over a range of acceptability thresholds, which will then be displayed in the cost-effectiveness plane and as a cost-effectiveness acceptability curve. A multilevel regression model will assess cost-effectiveness from a net benefit perspective. These approaches should provide the most detailed assessment available of the cost-effectiveness of PCI for coronary artery disease.

读者评论 与其他读者分享你的观点

用户名:未登录
我的评分