咨询与建议

看过本文的还看了

相关文献

该作者的其他文献

文献详情 >Laparoscopic versus open appen... 收藏

Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: Which way to go?

Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: Which way to go?

作     者:Ioannis Kehagias Stavros Nikolaos Karamanakos Spyros Panagiotopoulos Konstantinos Panagopoulos Fotis Kalfarentzos 

作者机构:Department of Surgery School of Medicine University Hospital of Patras Rion University Hospital Patras 26500 Greece 

出 版 物:《World Journal of Gastroenterology》 (世界胃肠病学杂志(英文版))

年 卷 期:2008年第14卷第31期

页      面:4909-4914页

核心收录:

学科分类:1002[医学-临床医学] 100210[医学-外科学(含:普外、骨外、泌尿外、胸心外、神外、整形、烧伤、野战外)] 10[医学] 

主  题:Laparoscopy Appendicitis Appendectomy Conventional appendectomy 

摘      要:AIM: To compare the outcome of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy. METHODS: Prospectively collected data from 293 consecutive patients with acute appendicitis were studied. These comprised of 165 patients who underwent conventional appendectomy and 128 patients treated laparoscopically. The two groups were compared with respect to operative time, length of hospital stay, postoperative pain, complication rate and cost. RESULTS: There were no statistical differences regarding patient characteristics between the two groups. Conversion to laparotomy was necessary in 2 patients (1.5%). Laparoscopic appendectomy was associated with a shorter hospital stay (2.2 d vs 3.1 d, P = 0.04), and lower incidence of wound infection (5.3% vs 12.8%, P = 0.03). However, in patients with complicated disease, intra-abdominal abscess formation was more common after laparoscopic appendectomy (5.3% vs 2.1%, P = 0.002). The operative time and analgesia requirements were similar in the two groups. The cost of treatment was higher by 370 € in the laparoscopic group. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic appendectomy is as safe and effi cient as open appendectomy, provided surgical experience and equipment are available.

读者评论 与其他读者分享你的观点

用户名:未登录
我的评分