咨询与建议

看过本文的还看了

相关文献

该作者的其他文献

文献详情 >Needling Neiguan(P6)for Treatm... 收藏

Needling Neiguan(P6)for Treatment of Low Pulse Pressure Syndrome—A Report of 31 Cases

Needling Neiguan(P6)for Treatment of Low Pulse Pressure Syndrome—A Report of 31 Cases

作     者:李培润 王辉 高晶 童安荣 吴并生 于良才 毛树章 

作者机构:TCM Hospital of Ningxia Autonomous Region Worker's Hospital of Yinchuan Zhongce(Great Wall)Rubber Company Ltd. OPD of Shenzhen Municipal Health School 

出 版 物:《Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine》 (中医杂志(英文版))

年 卷 期:2005年第25卷第4期

页      面:273-275页

核心收录:

学科分类:1005[医学-中医学] 100512[医学-针灸推拿学] 10[医学] 

主  题:内关穴 中医治疗 针灸治疗 低脉冲压综合症 

摘      要:Objective: To observe the impact of needling Neiguan (P 6) on the cardiovascular functional status in low pulse pressure syndrome. Method: 49 eligible patients were randomly assigned to a acupuncture group with bilateral Neiguan (P 6) needled for successive 3 days, and a medication group given a daily 20 mL of Shenmai Injectio intravenously dripped for successive 6 days. The blood pressure, pulse pressure, stroke volume (SV), cardiac output(CO)/min, left ventricle work index (LVWI), mean arterial pressure (MAP), total peripheral resistance (TPR), coronary perfusion pressure (CPP), pulmonary arterial wedge pressure (PAWP), effective blood volume (BV), blood viscosity (N), microcirculation half renewal rate (MHR), and cardiac muscle blood volume (CMBV) were determined before and after the treatment, which were compared with the parameters obtained in 23 healthy subjects. Results: The decreased pulse pressure of all patients before treatment (P0.01) increased significantly after treatment (P0.001). The levels of SV, CO, LVWI, PAWP, BV, MHR and CMBV were lowed when compared with the healthy subjects before treatment (P0.01), but all of them significantly increased after treatment (P0.01). The increased CPP, TPR and N before treatment (P0.01) were decreased after treatment (P0.01). Conclusion: The therapeutic effect of acupuncture at point Neiguan (P 6) was better than medication though some of the indexes showed no significant difference (P0.05).

读者评论 与其他读者分享你的观点

用户名:未登录
我的评分