Organizational ambidexterity, open innovation and innovation outputs: How do followers and low-flyer EU countries innovate?

作     者：Joao Leitao Sonia de Brito Dina Pereira 

作者机构：Faculty of Social and Human SciencesNECE-Research Unit in Business SciencesUniversity of Beira Interior6200-001CovilhaPortugal Research Unit in Business Sciences(NECE)University of Beira InteriorCovilhaPortugal Centre for Management Studies of Instituto Superior Tecnico(CEG-IST)University of Lisbon1649-004LisboaPortugal Instituto de Ciencias SociaisICsUniversity of Lisbon1649-004LisboaPortugal 

出 版 物：《International Journal of Innovation Studies》 (国际创新研究学报（英文）)

年 卷 期：2024年第8卷第2期

页      面：186-235页

学科分类：02[经济学] 0202[经济学-应用经济学] 03[法学] 0302[法学-政治学] 020206[经济学-国际贸易学] 030206[法学-国际政治] 020202[经济学-区域经济学] 

基　　金：supported by The Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology(Grants and NECE-UIDB/04630/2020) which provided financial support for this study.NECE and this work are supported by FCT-Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia,I.P.by project reference UIDB/04630/2020 and D0I identifier 10.54499/UIDP/04630/2020 

主　　题：Organizational ambidexterity CIS Cooperation Open innovation Public innovation policies 

摘      要：This study analyses the role played by organizational ambidexterity and open innovation in innovation outputs,considering business units with different levels of technological intensity(medium-high and high tech,and medium-low and low tech)for countries with different inno-vation *** countries considered in this paper are i)Estonia and Slovenia as innovation followers;i)Slovakia,Hungary,Spain,Czech Republic,Italy,Portugal,Norway,and Croatia as moderate innovators;and ii)Bulgaria,Lithuania and Romania as modest *** the empirical approach,the research hypotheses arise from the literature review and are tested using secondary data collected from the Community Innovation Survey(CIS)*** conceptual model is tested using the logistic regression method,which indicates suitable accuracy and reliability for empirical testing *** evidence reveals that for innovation followers,ambidexterity has a greater influence on the practice of eco-innovation,marketing innovation,and product *** moderate innovators,ambidexterity has a greater influence on the practice of product innovation,process innovation,and *** modest in-novators,ambidexterity has a greater influence on the practice of product innovation,process innovation,and *** regard to open innovation,for innovation followers,this has a negative influence on product innovation in medium-high and high-tech *** moderate innovators,open innovation has a greater influence in process,organizational,and *** the case of modest innovators,open innovation is more significant for innovation outputs in product,organizational,and marketing *** is not always positively related to innovation outputs.