咨询与建议

看过本文的还看了

相关文献

该作者的其他文献

文献详情 >Comparison of GTN Damage Model... 收藏

Comparison of GTN Damage Models for Sheet Metal Forming

Comparison of GTN Damage Models for Sheet Metal Forming

作     者:陈志英 董湘怀 

作者机构:National Die & Mold CAD Engineering Research CenterShanghai Jiaotong UniversityShanghai 200030 China 

出 版 物:《Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong university(Science)》 (上海交通大学学报(英文版))

年 卷 期:2008年第13卷第6期

页      面:739-743页

核心收录:

学科分类:080503[工学-材料加工工程] 08[工学] 0805[工学-材料科学与工程(可授工学、理学学位)] 0802[工学-机械工程] 080201[工学-机械制造及其自动化] 

基  金:the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 50575143) 

主  题:porous material anisotropy sheet forming damage finite element method 

摘      要:The Gurson-Tvergaard-Needleman(GTN) damage model was developed basing on anisotropic yield criterion to predict the damage evolution for anisotropic voided ductile *** s quadratic anisotropic yield criterion(1948) and Barlat s 3-component anisotropic yield criterion(1989) were used to describe the anisotropy of the *** defined subroutines were developed using the above *** the benchmark of NUMISHEET 93 square cup deep drawing as an example, the effect of matrix plastic anisotropy on a ductile material was *** predicted result by Barlat 89-GTN model has a better agreement with the experimental data than that by Hill 48-GTN and the original GTN model.

读者评论 与其他读者分享你的观点

用户名:未登录
我的评分