Whether to Abolish or Introduce Dual Regulation as Trade and Environmental Policy?
作者机构:Department of EconomicsFaculty of Economics and Business AdministrationKyoto University of Advanced ScienceJapan
出 版 物:《China & World Economy》 (中国与世界经济(英文版))
年 卷 期:2024年第32卷第1期
页 面:57-95页
核心收录:
学科分类:02[经济学] 0202[经济学-应用经济学] 0201[经济学-理论经济学] 020206[经济学-国际贸易学]
主 题:dual regulation heterogeneous firm Porter hypothesis research and development difficulty trade liberalization
摘 要:China,which has already introduced an environmental tax in an effort to decarbonize,has recently begun emissions trading and is using two environmental policies in tandem,but there are concerns about the impact on growth and *** and environmental policies affect firms entry and exit,resulting in changes in aggregate productivity and pollution *** study compares the impacts of single regulation and dual regulation on welfare,using a research-and-development based growth model with heterogeneous *** single regulation,the cleansing effect of trade liberalization could be *** dual regulation,trade liberalization decreases pollution and improves average productivity whereas decreasing total permits reduces *** the perspective of improving welfare it is desirable to choose dual regulation because trade liberalization can reduce total pollution emissions via the cleansing effect of trade liberalization.