咨询与建议

看过本文的还看了

相关文献

该作者的其他文献

文献详情 >ChatGPT能取代科学家吗? 收藏

ChatGPT能取代科学家吗?

Can ChatGPT replace scientists?

作     者:Paul Song 王赤 Paul Song;Chi Wang

作者机构:Space Science LaboratoryDepartment of Physics and Applied PhysicsUniversity of MassachusettsLowell MA 01852USA National Space Science CenterChinese Academy of SciencesBeijing 100190China 

出 版 物:《科学通报:英文版》 (Science Bulletin)

年 卷 期:2023年第68卷第19期

页      面:2128-2131,M0003页

核心收录:

学科分类:08[工学] 081104[工学-模式识别与智能系统] 0811[工学-控制科学与工程] 

主  题:reasoning artificial GPT 

摘      要:We examine chat generative pre-trained transformer(ChatGPT)from philosophy of science point of view[1]to address the question of whether ChatGPT can replace scientists in the foreseeable future.We show that ChatGPT mostly reflects social consensus than emulates human intelligence.GPT or other artificial intelligence(AI)systems will have to make some fundamental changes in its architectures.An inductive reasoning-based search system alone,no matter how sophisticated,will not be able to challenge human intelligence at a level above that of a good college student.To compete with human intelligence,AI has to include more major capabilities:deductive reasoning,dialectical reasoning,and discontinuous reasoning.

读者评论 与其他读者分享你的观点

用户名:未登录
我的评分