Assessment of retracted papers,and their retraction notices,from a cancer journal associated with“paper mills”

作     者：Jaime A.Teixeira da Silva Serhii Nazarovets Jaime A.Teixeira da Silva;Serhii Nazarovets

作者机构：Independent researcherIkenobe 3011-2Kagawa-ken761-0799Japan Borys Grinchenko Kyiv University18/2 Bulvarno-Kudriavska Str.04053 KyivUkraine 

出 版 物：《数据与情报科学学报:英文版》 (Journal of Data and Information Science)

年 卷 期：2023年第8卷第2期

页      面：118-125页

核心收录：

学科分类：0303[法学-社会学] 1205[管理学-图书情报与档案管理] 12[管理学] 1204[管理学-公共管理] 0302[法学-政治学] 1201[管理学-管理科学与工程(可授管理学、工学学位)] 120502[管理学-情报学] 0812[工学-计算机科学与技术（可授工学、理学学位）] 

主　　题：Indexing Oncology Publishing history PubMed Retraction Notices Transparency 

摘      要：Cancer research is occasionally described as being in a reproducibility *** cancer literature has ample papers retracted due to misconduct,including the use of paper mills,invalid authorship,or fake *** objective of this paper was to gain an appreciation of the balance of retractions and associated retraction notices of 23 retracted Cancer Biotherapy and Radiopharmaceuticals papers associated with paper *** 23 March 2023,these retracted papers had already accumulated 287 citations according to Web of Science Core Collection,253 according to Scopus,and 365 according to Google Scholar,i.e.,metrically speaking,they were highly *** authors had an affiliation(71%being a hospital)in ***(12/21;57%)of corresponding authors had emails with a@*** *** of the retraction notices(i.e.,17%)explicitly indicated paper mills as a reason for retraction although,in general,the retraction notices lacked details and background that could assist readers’understanding of the retractions.