Evaluation of ecological capability and land use planning for different uses of land with a new model of EMOLUP in Jahrom County,Iran

作     者：Parviz JOKAR Masoud MASOUDI Parviz JOKAR;Masoud MASOUDI

作者机构：Department of Natural Resources and Environmental EngineeringSchool of AgricultureShiraz UniversityShiraz ***Iran 

出 版 物：《Frontiers of Earth Science》 (地球科学前沿（英文版）)

年 卷 期：2023年第17卷第2期

页      面：561-575页

核心收录：

学科分类：08[工学] 0708[理学-地球物理学] 09[农学] 0903[农学-农业资源与环境] 083306[工学-城乡规划管理] 0704[理学-天文学] 0833[工学-城乡规划学] 

基　　金：This work would not have been possible without the financial support of Shiraz University(Grant No.93GRD1M75441) 

主　　题：EMOLUP Model geomean Boolean prioritizing land use capability 

摘      要：Land use planning is one of the basic principles of sustainable development in a region and in a *** main objective of this paper is to test a new model of land use planning in order to evaluate ecological suitability and prioritize different land uses in Jahrom County placed in Fars Province,*** two main steps were prepared for the new model of Eco-Socioeconomic Model of Land Use Planning(EMOLUP).Step 1 includes ecological capability evaluation of different land uses including forest,rangeland,agriculture,conservation,and *** step is composed of the geometric mean method instead of the Boolean method;and step 2 includes land use planning and prioritizing for the various uses mentioned *** step is composed of intersecting ecological capability maps and land use planning,based on two scenarios(economic and social).It was compared with qualitative and current quantitative ***,current land use is employed for calibrating and modifying the *** results of ecological suitability evaluation showed that the EMOLUP model has more accuracy in the process of comparison than other current ***,revised method using the geometric mean(with overall accuracy72 and kappa index0.55 for all land uses and rangeland with overall accuracy=32 and kappa index=0.02)is better than Boolean models,and the method of the calibrated geometric mean(with overall accuracy87 and kappa index0.73 for all land uses)is the best among different used *** should be noted that the arithmetic mean has the lowest accuracy(with overall accuracy45 and kappa index0.24 for all land uses).Also,the results of prioritizing and land use planning showed that the quantitative method with two socio-economic scenarios(result based on average of EPM erosion model=0.3 that means 30%of modification in whole study area land uses)is the best method for land use planning in the study area.