Multi-attribute Group Decision-making Based on Hesitant Bipolar-valued Fuzzy Information and Social Network

作     者：Dhanalakshmi R Sovan Samanta Arun Kumar Sivaraman Jeong Gon Lee Balasundaram A Sanamdikar Sanjay Tanaji Priya Ravindran 

作者机构：Department of Computer Science and EngineeringKCG College of TechnologyChennai600097Tamil NaduIndia Department of MathematicsTamralipta MahavidyalayaWest Bengal721636India School of Computer Science and EngineeringVellore Institute of TechnologyChennai600127Tamil NaduIndia Division of Applied MathematicsWonkwang UniversityIksan-SiJeonbuk54538Korea School of Computer Science and EngineeringCenter for Cyber Physical SystemsVellore Institute of TechnologyChennai600127Tamil NaduIndia Department of Instrumentation EngineeringPDEAs College of EngineeringManjari412307PuneIndia Engineering and Research ServicesHCL TechnologiesChennai600119India 

出 版 物：《Computer Systems Science & Engineering》 (计算机系统科学与工程（英文）)

年 卷 期：2023年第44卷第3期

页      面：1939-1950页

核心收录：

学科分类：07[理学] 0701[理学-数学] 070101[理学-基础数学] 

基　　金：This paper was supported by Wonkwang University in 2022 

主　　题：Group decision-making aggregation operators hesitant bipolar-valued fuzzy set 

摘      要：Fuzzy sets have undergone several expansions and generalisations in the literature,including Atanasov’s intuitionistic fuzzy sets,type 2 fuzzy sets,and fuzzy multisets,to name a *** can be regarded as fuzzy multisets from a formal standpoint;nevertheless,their interpretation differs from the two other approaches to fuzzy multisets that are currently *** fuzzy sets(HFS)are very useful if consultants have hesitation in dealing with group decision-making problems between several possible ***,these possible memberships can be not only crisp values in[0,1],but also interval values during a practical evaluation *** bipolar valued fuzzy set(HBVFS)is a generalization of *** paper aims to introduce a general framework of multi-attribute group decision-making using social *** propose two types of decision-making processes:Type-1 decision-making process and Type-2 decision-making *** the Type-1 decision-making process,the experts’original opinion is proces for thefinal ranking of *** Type-2 decision making processs,there are two major aspects we ***,consistency tests and checking of consensus models are given for detecting that the judgments are logically ***,the framework demands(partial)decision-makers to review their ***,the coherence and consensus of several HBVFSs are established forfinal ranking of *** proposed framework is clarified by an example of software packages selection of a university.