咨询与建议

看过本文的还看了

相关文献

该作者的其他文献

文献详情 >RANS Simulation of Methane Dif... 收藏

RANS Simulation of Methane Diffusion Flame: Comparison of Two Chemical Kinetics Mechanisms

RANS Simulation of Methane Diffusion Flame: Comparison of Two Chemical Kinetics Mechanisms

作     者:Guessab Ahmed Abdelkader Aris Iskander Gokalp Faouzi Tabet Helal 

作者机构:Industrial Products and Systems Innovations Laboratory (IPSILab) ENPO Algeria Laboratory Gaseous Fuels and Environment Institute of Mechanical Engineering USTO Oran 31001 Algeria Laboratory Reagents and Combustions System CNRS 1C Avenue de la Recherche Scientifique Orleans 45071 France Division of Thermodynamics and Thermal Process Engineering Department of Process Engineering Brandenburg University ofTechnology Cottbus Konrad Wachmanns-Alle 103046 Germany 

出 版 物:《Journal of Physical Science and Application》 (物理科学与应用(英文版))

年 卷 期:2013年第3卷第6期

页      面:400-408页

学科分类:070904[理学-构造地质学] 081704[工学-应用化学] 0709[理学-地质学] 07[理学] 070304[理学-物理化学(含∶化学物理)] 08[工学] 0817[工学-化学工程与技术] 0703[理学-化学] 

主  题:Co-flow methane/air turbulent flame combustion numerical simulation chemical kinetic. 

摘      要:Turbulent non-premixed combustion of gaseous fuels is of importance for many technical applications, especially for the steel and refractory industry. Accurate turbulent flow and temperature fields are of major importance in order to predict details on the concentration fields. The performances of the GRI-Mech 3.0 and the Jones and Lindstedt mechanisms are compared. Detailed chemistry is included with the GRI-Mech 3.0 and J-L kinetic mechanisms in combination with the laminar flamelet combustion model. The combustion system selected for this comparison is a confined non-premixed methane flame surrounded by co-flowing air The simulation results are compared with experimental data of Lewis and Smoot (2001).

读者评论 与其他读者分享你的观点

用户名:未登录
我的评分