咨询与建议

看过本文的还看了

相关文献

该作者的其他文献

文献详情 >Comparison of Parallel Kinemat... 收藏

Comparison of Parallel Kinematic Machines with Three Translational Degrees of Freedom and Linear Actuation

Comparison of Parallel Kinematic Machines with Three Translational Degrees of Freedom and Linear Actuation

作     者:PRAUSE Isabel CHARAF EDDINE Sami CORVES Burkhard 

作者机构:Department of Mechanism Theory and Dynamics of Machines RWTH Aachen University 

出 版 物:《Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering》 (中国机械工程学报(英文版))

年 卷 期:2015年第28卷第4期

页      面:841-850页

核心收录:

学科分类:0817[工学-化学工程与技术] 08[工学] 080202[工学-机械电子工程] 0807[工学-动力工程及工程热物理] 0804[工学-仪器科学与技术] 0802[工学-机械工程] 0811[工学-控制科学与工程] 0801[工学-力学(可授工学、理学学位)] 080201[工学-机械制造及其自动化] 

主  题:parallel kinematic machines comparison benchmark selection scheme 

摘      要:The development of new robot structures, in particular of parallel kinematic machines(PKM), is widely systematized by different structure synthesis methods. Recent research increasingly focuses on PKM with less than six degrees of freedom(DOF). However, an overall comparison and evaluation of these structures is missing. In order to compare symmetrical PKM with three translational DOF, different evaluation criteria are used. Workspace, maximum actuation forces and velocities, power, actuator stiffness, accuracy and transmission behavior are taken into account to investigate strengths and weaknesses of the PKMs. A selection scheme based on possible configurations of translational PKM including different frame configurations is presented. Moreover, an optimization method based on a genetic algorithm is described to determine the geometric parameters of the selected PKM for an exemplary load case and a prescribed workspace. The values of the mentioned criteria are determined for all considered PKM with respect to certain boundary conditions. The distribution and spreading of these values within the prescribed workspace is presented by using box plots for each criterion. Thereby, the performance characteristics of the different structures can be compared directly. The results show that there is no "best" PKM. Further inquiries such as dynamic or stiffness analysis are necessary to extend the comparison and to finally select a PKM.

读者评论 与其他读者分享你的观点

用户名:未登录
我的评分