咨询与建议

看过本文的还看了

相关文献

该作者的其他文献

文献详情 >An investigation on applicatio... 收藏

An investigation on application potentiality of microstructure heat sinks with different flow topological morphology

An investigation on application potentiality of microstructure heat sinks with different flow topological morphology

作     者:YAO XiaoLe SHI QianLei LIU Qian QIN Le JU Xing XU Chao 

作者机构:Key Laboratory of Power Station Energy Transfer Conversion and System of MOENorth China Electric Power UniversityBeijing 102206China 

出 版 物:《Science China(Technological Sciences)》 (中国科学(技术科学英文版))

年 卷 期:2022年第65卷第12期

页      面:2895-2909页

核心收录:

学科分类:080903[工学-微电子学与固体电子学] 080702[工学-热能工程] 0809[工学-电子科学与技术(可授工学、理学学位)] 08[工学] 0807[工学-动力工程及工程热物理] 

基  金:supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(Grant No.51876062) the Interdisciplinary Innovation Program of North China Electric Power University 

主  题:heat sink topology manifold microchannel micro-pin-fin high heat flux 

摘      要:Microstructure heat sinks have great potential for high heat flux *** this paper,we compared microchannel(MC),micro-pin-fin(MPF),manifold microchannel(MMC),and manifold micro-pin-fin(MMPF)heat sinks to figure out the pros and *** flow and manifold unit models are used to study thermal and hydrodynamic *** heat sinks with different channel/fin sizes,manifold numbers,and porosities are discussed according to the pressure drop,temperature,thermal resistance,and coefficient of *** show that MMC and MMPF heat sinks are superior to MC and MPF heat sinks,and there are also differences between MMC and MMPF heat ***,the MMPF heat sink has lower maximum temperature,temperature non-uniformity,and total thermal resistance R_(tot).In contrast,the MMC heat sink has a lower pressure drop and higher *** the MMPF heat sink,at the nozzle width of 6.75μm and the MPF width of 70.71μm(porosity=0.167),it achieves the lowest total thermal resistance of R_(tot)=2.97×10^(-6)K m^(2)/*** 10^(3)W/cm^(2)heat flux,the maximum surface temperature rise is 29.74 K,and the maximum temperature difference of the heating surface is 3.15 *** research initially provides a clear reference on the selection of single-phase cooling microstructures for ultra-high heat flux dissipation.

读者评论 与其他读者分享你的观点

用户名:未登录
我的评分