Competition vs cooperation:renewable energy investment under cap-and-trade mechanisms
作者机构:College of Management ScienceChengdu University of TechnologyChengdu 610059China Rowe School of BusinessDalhousie UniversityHalifaxNS B3H 4R2Canada School of Management and EconomicsUniversity of Electronic Science and Technology of ChinaChengdu 611731China
出 版 物:《Financial Innovation》 (金融创新(英文))
年 卷 期:2022年第8卷第1期
页 面:2079-2106页
核心收录:
学科分类:0202[经济学-应用经济学] 02[经济学] 020205[经济学-产业经济学]
基 金:support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China(Grant No.71531003) Philosophy and Social Science Research Fund of Chengdu University of Technology(YJ2021-QN005) Center for Trans-Himalaya Studies(KX2022B01)
主 题:Cap-and-trade mechanism Renewable energy investment Competitive market Cooperative market
摘 要:This paper explores the incentives of investment in renewable energy of two utility firms who compete or cooperate under either a cap-and-trade grandfathering mechanism(GM)or benchmarking mechanism(BM).We find that utility firms will invest in renewable energy more under BM than under GM,in both competitive and cooperative markets,and they will invest more in a competitive market than in a cooperative market,under either GM or ***,utility firms will produce more electricity and generate more total carbon emissions under BM than under *** profits of two firms,however,are higher in cooperative market than in competitive *** government will benefit from implementing a BM to encourage utility firms to invest in renewable energy in a competing market.