Examining spatio-temporal variations in carbon budget and carbon compensation zoning in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration based on major functional zones
基于主体功能区的京津冀城市群碳收支时空分异与碳补偿分区作者机构:Key Laboratory of Regional Sustainable Development ModelingInstitute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources ResearchCASBeijing 100101China College of Resources and EnvironmentUniversity of Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijing 100049China Institute of Strategy Research of Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay AreaGuangzhou 510070China
出 版 物:《Journal of Geographical Sciences》 (地理学报(英文版))
年 卷 期:2022年第32卷第10期
页 面:1911-1934页
核心收录:
学科分类:12[管理学] 1204[管理学-公共管理] 083305[工学-城乡生态环境与基础设施规划] 08[工学] 0833[工学-城乡规划学]
基 金:National Natural Science Foundation of China(42121001) National Natural Science Foundation of China(42130712) National Natural Science Foundation of China(42022007) Youth Innovation Promotion Association,CAS(2018069)
主 题:major functional zones(MFZ) carbon budget carbon compensation zoning spatial optimization Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration(BTHUA)
摘 要:Research on the carbon budget and zoning for carbon compensation in major functional zones(MFZs)is important for formulating strategies for low-carbon development for each functional zone,promoting the collaborative governance of the regional ecological environment,and achieving high-quality *** work can also contribute to achieving peak emissions and carbon *** paper constructs a theoretical framework for the carbon budget and carbon compensation from the perspective of the MFZ,uses 157 county-level units of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration(BTHUA)as the study area,and introduces the concentration index,normalized revealed comparative advantage index,and Self Organizing Mapping-K-means(SOM-K-means)model to examine spatio-temporal variations in the carbon budget and carbon compensation zoning for the BTHUA from the perspective of *** authors propose a scheme for the spatial minimization of carbon emissions as oriented by low-carbon *** results show that:(1)From 2000 to 2017,the carbon budget exhibited an upward trend of volatility,its centralization index was higher than the“warning lineof 0.4,and large regional differences in it were noted on the whole.(2)There were significant regional differences in the carbon budget,and carbon emissions exhibited a core-periphery spatial pattern,with a high-value center at Beijing-Tianjin-Tangshan that gradually decreased as it moved ***,the spatial pattern of carbon absorption tended to be stable,showing an inverted“U-shaped*** was high in the east,north,and west,and was low in the middle and the south.(3)The carbon budget was consistent with the strategic positioning of the MFZ,and the optimized development zone and key development zone were the main pressure-bearing areas for carbon emissions,while the key ecological functional zone was the dominant zone of carbon *** difference in the centralization index of carbon absorption among the func